| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
Jason 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 7533 Location: Stapleton, Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 10:27 am Post subject: Look Around |
#1 |
This sport is having a problem, who is the youngest pilot you know
when I started 12 years ago.......I was the youngest person I knew......
now 12 years later......I'm still the youngest HG pilot on the hill.......12 YEARS...over a decade.....and no new blood...
the only reason I'm in it, is I had a father that was in it.....I suspect the same is true for Ryan....who is right about the same age I am
who taught ryan.....wasn't it his dad?
who taught me....I had a few instructors......but by and large my dad taught me most of what I know.....and now..... I can't share that knowledge/joy/experience with anyone.......unless I spend spend spend to get the proper paperwork....which makes no sense to do since I have no interest in ever selling a ride/lesson
30 years ago there was no "tandem exemption"....then there was a tandem rating.....and now there are 3 tandem ratings.....the first all but useless....
if we want more people in this sport.....we need to make it easier for people to share the experience
it only took 10 minutes this week for 3 of my friends to see why this sport has so little young blood in it _________________ TSA, DHS, NDAA and SOPA Seig Heil! |
|
|
|
Manta_Dreaming 1 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Jan 2012 Posts: 445
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 10:58 am Post subject: |
#2 |
The solution is for all the old pilots to get fake ids.
I've actually met several pilots in their teens, so don't be so glum. _________________ Mountains always have the right of way.
If you've never forgotten anything in your life, you don't need to do a hook-in check.
You're going to die anyway so you might as well fly. |
|
|
|
Jason 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 7533 Location: Stapleton, Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:00 am Post subject: |
#3 |
| Manta_Dreaming wrote: |
The solution is for all the old pilots to get fake ids.
I've actually met several pilots in their teens, so don't be so glum. |
ask guys on the hill when they started.....
look at old HG videos.....they used to all be young guys......now finding someone under 30 is rare..... _________________ TSA, DHS, NDAA and SOPA Seig Heil! |
|
|
|
Scorl 3 thumbs up


Joined: 11 Oct 2011 Posts: 104 Location: Dayton, OH
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:02 pm Post subject: |
#4 |
I'm 25 and a half, I'm a young'n!
At the Colorado Fly Week I was the second youngest hang pilot. There was also a 21 year old, he and his dad were both H2's.
Here in Ohio there are a number of pilots working toward their hang 2's or hang 3's that are around my age. From my limited perspective things aren't so bad as you make them out. _________________ My learning experience: http://mypathtopilot.blogspot.com
My Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/Scorl?feature=mhee |
|
|
|
Jason 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 7533 Location: Stapleton, Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:17 pm Post subject: |
#5 |
| Scorl wrote: |
I'm 25 and a half, I'm a young'n!
At the Colorado Fly Week I was the second youngest hang pilot. There was also a 21 year old, he and his dad were both H2's.
Here in Ohio there are a number of pilots working toward their hang 2's or hang 3's that are around my age. From my limited perspective things aren't so bad as you make them out. |
why aren't we getting the teenagers....
I think Cloudhopper was 13 when he started
I was 16....
Ryan was ?
Hangdiver?
Spark? _________________ TSA, DHS, NDAA and SOPA Seig Heil! |
|
|
|
Mokimadness 3 thumbs up


Joined: 12 Nov 2011 Posts: 16 Location: Berkeley
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:23 pm Post subject: |
#6 |
I'm the youngest pilot I know. I'm 21 and Ive been dreaming of hang gliding since I was 9 years old and saw a video of someone flying on TV. The only reason I was able to pick up hang gliding is because of the Berkeley hang gliding club. Here are what I see as the primary blocks for young people like me picking up hang gliding:
1. Money:
Most instructors nowadays want you to purchase all your own equipment almost immediately which can run upwards of many thousands of dollars and on top of that the rate for private instruction is pretty steep. So if you're on your own which most people my age are nowadays that can be next to impossible to do.
2.Time commitment:
Learning to hang glide requires a lot of time and the rewards aren't that visible initially, especially for someone like me who started on low hills and slowly progressed upwards it can be very time consuming (I have never flown tandem).
3. Exposure and misinformation :
Nobody knows what hang gliding is, where and how to learn, and how amazing it can be. I have had countless friends who were completely shocked that I was hang gliding, after I explained to them what hang gliding is, and what soaring is. Most people assume you jump off of a cliff and glide to the ground in a few minutes and thats it. If I wanted to do that I would have picked up skydiving.
How to address these issues In my opinion:
1.Money :
The only reason I was able to afford my lessons and gear is because I am part of a co-op. The berkeley hang gliding co-op and it costs a mere fraction of learning it elsewhere. I use gear provided by the club, and in return I put in my time to help the club and also pay a small fee.
2.Time:
This part is really not something you would want to fix. Hang gliding is not something that I think you want to rush and you want to make sure you perfect your skills on every step of the way to avoid nasty life threatening and bone breaking accidents. Its worth it to take all the time you need to learn things properly.
3. Exposure:
There is no exposure for young people to hang gliding. Nothing on the internet, or the tv, or pretty much anywhere. I'm not sure how exactly this could be fixed but for my part I have been trying to inform all of my friends and people I meet about what hang gliding is and to try to get them interested in picking up the sport.
Well thats my 2 cents anyway, I'm sure there are lots of differing opinions on how to fix this or even if there is an issue to fix. |
|
|
|
Avnav8r 3 thumbs up


Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Posts: 994 Location: Trenton, Georgia
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:33 pm Post subject: |
#7 |
Hey,
We have a H2 pilot at Lookout named Ethan. His dad, Jason, is a Tandem Pilot at LMFP. Ethan recently had a great flight at Lookout where he outflew many of the experienced pilots. He seems to be a natural pilot and is very enthusiastic
John Stokes
www.soarsouth.org
www.osceolabaldeagle.com _________________ To err is human. To blame it on someone else, shows management potential. |
|
|
|
Jason 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 7533 Location: Stapleton, Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:37 pm Post subject: |
#8 |
Moki
I think you hit on 2 things
Money
Exposure
Money---itd be a lot cheaper if friends could teach friends......I have some experience with the berkley club...I don't know if they charge for training or not, but I know the berkley club has come a long way in the last 10 years
Exposure----free rides!.....id give them......but I'm not about to spend the money & jump thru all the hoops that USHPSA has put in my way to do that _________________ TSA, DHS, NDAA and SOPA Seig Heil! |
|
|
|
Paul H 2 thumbs up


Joined: 13 May 2008 Posts: 2184 Location: Reno, NV
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 4:06 pm Post subject: |
#9 |
Many people complain about the cost to get into hang gliding, but it's not really any more expensive than many other sports/hobbies. Look at what is costs to get a kid into motocross. The complaint about the cost of instruction is kind of ridiculous. Who has the time or desire to teach for free? While it's possible to do some free instruction, how many people have the time and/or can afford to take time off from a regular job to do it? Is there something wrong with someone making a living as instructor? Shouldn't they get paid a decent wage for their time? Times have changed so comparing the requirements that exist now with what existed 30 years ago is useless. The feds take an interest in tandems now so there have to be more serious requirements for tandem pilots. The legal risk for instructors is much greater now with our lawsuit happy society. Another thing to keep in mind when comparing the sport now with years ago is the number of pilots who used to die while hang gliding. Things are a lot better now even if there are more hoops to jump through. _________________ Paul H
U2 160 USHPA # 51178 KE7VOG
H4, FL, AT, PL, FSL, RLF, TUR, X-C, CL, AWCL, 360, HA,
USN ret. A & P mechanic |
|
|
|
jjcote 3 thumbs up


Joined: 01 Dec 2007 Posts: 3216 Location: Lunenburg, MA, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 4:43 pm Post subject: |
#10 |
Hang glider pilots tend to be old guys. That doesn't bother me.
Hang glider pilots are few and far between. That doesn't bother me, either.
The only person about whom I have any interest as to whether he flies or not is me. _________________ H4 + various skills (only foot-launch so far)
WW UltraSport 147, WW Falcon2 170, PacAir Vision Mark IV 17
My HG wiki profile and my flying blog |
|
|
|
Eteamjack 3 thumbs up


Joined: 26 Jan 2008 Posts: 1125 Location: So Cal
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:23 pm Post subject: |
#11 |
| jjcote wrote: |
Hang glider pilots tend to be old guys. That doesn't bother me.
Hang glider pilots are few and far between. That doesn't bother me, either.
The only person about whom I have any interest as to whether he flies or not is me. |
Amen  _________________ H4 (1979) Lake Elsinore. Ca. U2 160 (Sweet) |
|
|
|
HangDiver 3 thumbs up


Joined: 06 Nov 2007 Posts: 2075 Location: Salida, Villa Grove, Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:24 pm Post subject: |
#12 |
Jason has a valid point and I agree with him. However, there isn't any way around it. When I started in 1976 we were "Ground Skimmers". We did not factor into aviation. We didn't exist.
Step forward 30 years. Flights to 17,999 are common. Mike Barber goes 438 miles (Dustin/Johnny went 475 + last week). We fly with food, water, instruments, O2 and parachutes. Our numbers are many and liability to land owners in our litiguous society looms large.
In essence, our sport is the victim of its own success. Regulation of hang gliding is here to stay. And while the new hang gliding Risk and Mitigation Plan may seem to be an additional burden, it may in fact protect our future.
Our sport is different now and we must adapt to survive. Jason gave tandems this past week and introduced hang gliding to someone in the most fundumental way. He didn't say it this way, but as he correctly observers, with the lack of exposure we're behind the curve.
Rich J. _________________ http://hangdiver.blogspot.com/
Last edited by HangDiver on Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:47 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
|
|
Paul H 2 thumbs up


Joined: 13 May 2008 Posts: 2184 Location: Reno, NV
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:36 pm Post subject: |
#13 |
| Jason wrote: |
Moki
I think you hit on 2 things
Money
Exposure
Money---itd be a lot cheaper if friends could teach friends......I have some experience with the berkley club...I don't know if they charge for training or not, but I know the berkley club has come a long way in the last 10 years
Exposure----free rides!.....id give them......but I'm not about to spend the money & jump thru all the hoops that USHPSA has put in my way to do that |
There is nothing preventing friends teaching friends. For a pilot to earn a rating to enable them to fly at sites that require it you only need to demonstrate proficiency at the required skills for an instructor for the sign-off. It doesn't matter where you gained that proficiency or who instructed you. _________________ Paul H
U2 160 USHPA # 51178 KE7VOG
H4, FL, AT, PL, FSL, RLF, TUR, X-C, CL, AWCL, 360, HA,
USN ret. A & P mechanic |
|
|
|
Suneagle 3 thumbs up


Joined: 29 Feb 2012 Posts: 185 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 8:39 pm Post subject: |
#14 |
The Canungra Hang Gliding Club has a whole bunch of new young pilots on Fun 2's. Youngest is 15 years old and his Dad (a non-flier) is there to support him. There are a large bunch of oldies in the HG side of our club too, plus a few pilots coming across from PG. Our club has about 150 members split about 60/40 PG/HG. With a dozen pilots who fly both.
My feeling is that we don't need to recruit people. Hang gliding should and does draw those who want to do it to its arms. Sites are busy enough and landing areas threatened by overuse (especially PG).
People are drawn to other sports, whether it's curling, darts, base jumping or whatever. It seems to me that anyone and everyone can give PG a go and the result is many inexperienced pilots with little or no competence or understanding of the air. Lots of rescues, accidents and bad publicity reflecting on all of us.
Yeah, I sound like Rick Masters, sorry.
Anyway, I notice that novice HG pilots tend to stay under supervision a lot longer than PG pilots. I'm uneasy flying in a sky full of PG pilots as I know some of them have no idea and will fly through your turning circle unaware of the danger and nuisance that they make of themselves.
Flying with experienced PG pilots is a pleasure as you can trust them to fly considerately and safely and even work thermals with them in confidence.
Novice HG are easily identifiable on their single surface machines (though not all single surface are novices) so it's easier to give the novice some space. With a sky full of PG, they all look the same to most HG pilots and you often feel like you are flying an obstacle course on a tough day rather than just concentrating on the thermal and getting up and out of there.
These are my observations and I hope I don't offend people with my personal feelings. I've had a mid-air king hit from an idiot low hour PG who wasn't looking where he was going, so I'm probably over-aware and a tad biased.
Jerry _________________ Member of the old farts brigade: Simply sublime supine and peace of mind.
1980 - Present: McDonald Eagle 5,Moyes:- Mega 2, Meteor, GT, GTR, Xtralite, Lightspeed, Malibu.
Extassy, Airwave Magic III, Vision 5
Airborne:- trikes x 2, C4. Currently flying a REV.
Plus a whole bunch of Paragliders 2008 - 2011
Member: Canungra Hang Gliding Club - Gold Coast, Australia. |
|
|
|
Jason 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 7533 Location: Stapleton, Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:33 am Post subject: |
#15 |
| Paul H wrote: |
| Many people complain about the cost to get into hang gliding, but it's not really any more expensive than many other sports/hobbies. Look at what is costs to get a kid into motocross. |
I can hop onto craigslist and buy a bike for 1200 bucks and ride it tomorrow in any of thousands of areas with no instructon
http://denver.craigslist.org/mcy/3129692362.html
| Quote: |
| The complaint about the cost of instruction is kind of ridiculous. Who has the time or desire to teach for free? While it's possible to do some free instruction, how many people have the time and/or can afford to take time off from a regular job to do it? |
I certainly don't have the time to teach for free, but I do have the desire to introduce people that I think have the capability to learn by giving them a ride..
| Quote: |
Is there something wrong with someone making a living as instructor? Shouldn't they get paid a decent wage for their time? |
there is nothing wrong with that at all, I'd love to be able to introduce people and then point them to a local instructor
| Quote: |
Times have changed so comparing the requirements that exist now with what existed 30 years ago is useless. The feds take an interest in tandems now so there have to be more serious requirements for tandem pilots. |
the feds didn't create the 3 tiered tandem system, USHPA did
| Quote: |
| The legal risk for instructors is much greater now with our lawsuit happy society. Another thing to keep in mind when comparing the sport now with years ago is the number of pilots who used to die while hang gliding. Things are a lot better now even if there are more hoops to jump through. |
why did more pilots die in the 70s then now?...theres a few possible explanations.......
-we have better instruction
-we have better equipment and parachutes
-the average pilot age has more then doubled and today's pilots are old not bold (and a lot of pilots have been in it for 30+ years and with that experience make better choices)
i suspect its a combination of factors....
as for the litigation.......yes its a lawsuit happy society.....and we have liability wavers up to our chests....how many instructors have actually been sued? _________________ TSA, DHS, NDAA and SOPA Seig Heil! |
|
|
|
Paul H 2 thumbs up


Joined: 13 May 2008 Posts: 2184 Location: Reno, NV
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:37 pm Post subject: |
#16 |
| Jason wrote: |
| Paul H wrote: |
| Many people complain about the cost to get into hang gliding, but it's not really any more expensive than many other sports/hobbies. Look at what is costs to get a kid into motocross. |
I can hop onto craigslist and buy a bike for 1200 bucks and ride it tomorrow in any of thousands of areas with no instructon
http://denver.craigslist.org/mcy/3129692362.html
| Quote: |
| The complaint about the cost of instruction is kind of ridiculous. Who has the time or desire to teach for free? While it's possible to do some free instruction, how many people have the time and/or can afford to take time off from a regular job to do it? |
I certainly don't have the time to teach for free, but I do have the desire to introduce people that I think have the capability to learn by giving them a ride..
| Quote: |
Is there something wrong with someone making a living as instructor? Shouldn't they get paid a decent wage for their time? |
there is nothing wrong with that at all, I'd love to be able to introduce people and then point them to a local instructor
| Quote: |
Times have changed so comparing the requirements that exist now with what existed 30 years ago is useless. The feds take an interest in tandems now so there have to be more serious requirements for tandem pilots. |
the feds didn't create the 3 tiered tandem system, USHPA did
| Quote: |
| The legal risk for instructors is much greater now with our lawsuit happy society. Another thing to keep in mind when comparing the sport now with years ago is the number of pilots who used to die while hang gliding. Things are a lot better now even if there are more hoops to jump through. |
why did more pilots die in the 70s then now?...theres a few possible explanations.......
-we have better instruction
-we have better equipment and parachutes
-the average pilot age has more then doubled and today's pilots are old not bold (and a lot of pilots have been in it for 30+ years and with that experience make better choices)
i suspect its a combination of factors....
as for the litigation.......yes its a lawsuit happy society.....and we have liability wavers up to our chests....how many instructors have actually been sued? |
You can buy a cheap, used HG off Craigs list, too, and fly it without instruction. Which do you think is more likely to kill you?
I understand your desire to give people a ride, but the FAA requires you to be signed off by the USHPA. I believe that's a good idea. I've seen some pilots give tandem rides without doing it legally or without proper training and they are dangerous at best. If you believe the current program is too cumbersome or difficult, then come up with a better one and get the USHPA to buy off on it. Just because someone is a decent solo pilot that doesn't mean they will automatically be a good tandem pilot.
Why don't you point people towards a local instructor? Isn't there one? If not, why not? Were they force to give it up because nobody was willing to pay them for their time and dedication? Lack of local pilot support?
You list of reasons why the sport is safer now is correct. That's why I said that compairing the current form of HG to what is was 30 years ago it pointless. _________________ Paul H
U2 160 USHPA # 51178 KE7VOG
H4, FL, AT, PL, FSL, RLF, TUR, X-C, CL, AWCL, 360, HA,
USN ret. A & P mechanic |
|
|
|
ktbearpaws
Joined: 20 Jun 2012 Posts: 4 Location: Southern West Virginia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:59 pm Post subject: |
#17 |
Well.... I can't really say I am "into" it quite yet...I am just now getting "hooked up" with somew of the locals willing to kinda show me the ropes... I am 43 years old and just now getting into it, But, I have wanted to do it all my life!!
The ony reason I am doing it now is, I was ignorant on how to get started. When I was younger there was no internet, so information was hard to come by. til I found this site getting started seemed more like an impossible dream. I am finding it won't be has impossible as it seemed.
I also thought it would be a lot more expensive than it really is...When I was younger I didn't have a job that paid what I thought I would need to get started.
While the schools can seem a bit pricey, not really that diffrent from deer hunting. My biggest problem will be the distance away from my instuctors..But, I am determined to figure a way out.
And I think one of the biggest deterent was I didn't think anyone in my part of the country was into it... I thought most were on the west coast.....I mean it wasn't like i ever seen anyone out flying.... |
|
|
|
Jason 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 7533 Location: Stapleton, Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:57 am Post subject: |
#18 |
| Paul H wrote: |
I understand your desire to give people a ride, but the FAA requires you to be signed off by the USHPA. I believe that's a good idea. I've seen some pilots give tandem rides without doing it legally or without proper training and they are dangerous at best. If you believe the current program is too cumbersome or difficult, then come up with a better one and get the USHPA to buy off on it. Just because someone is a decent solo pilot that doesn't mean they will automatically be a good tandem pilot.
|
did the people you see have a tandem rating at all? if so which of the 3..
| Quote: |
Why don't you point people towards a local instructor? Isn't there one? If not, why not? Were they force to give it up because nobody was willing to pay them for their time and dedication? Lack of local pilot support?
You list of reasons why the sport is safer now is correct. That's why I said that compairing the current form of HG to what is was 30 years ago it pointless. |
i have pointed to the local instructor.......given out his website even.....
i think the number one reason its safer now then the 80s is that pilots are older and making more conservative choices (have kids families etc)......there was nothing wrong with a MkIV, or a Harrier, they are perfectly safe aircraft _________________ TSA, DHS, NDAA and SOPA Seig Heil! |
|
|
|
Paul H 2 thumbs up


Joined: 13 May 2008 Posts: 2184 Location: Reno, NV
|
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:51 pm Post subject: |
#19 |
| Jason wrote: |
| Paul H wrote: |
I understand your desire to give people a ride, but the FAA requires you to be signed off by the USHPA. I believe that's a good idea. I've seen some pilots give tandem rides without doing it legally or without proper training and they are dangerous at best. If you believe the current program is too cumbersome or difficult, then come up with a better one and get the USHPA to buy off on it. Just because someone is a decent solo pilot that doesn't mean they will automatically be a good tandem pilot.
|
did the people you see have a tandem rating at all? if so which of the 3..
| Quote: |
Why don't you point people towards a local instructor? Isn't there one? If not, why not? Were they force to give it up because nobody was willing to pay them for their time and dedication? Lack of local pilot support?
You list of reasons why the sport is safer now is correct. That's why I said that compairing the current form of HG to what is was 30 years ago it pointless. |
i have pointed to the local instructor.......given out his website even.....
i think the number one reason its safer now then the 80s is that pilots are older and making more conservative choices (have kids families etc)......there was nothing wrong with a MkIV, or a Harrier, they are perfectly safe aircraft |
The people I mentioned didn't have any tandem rating. That's what I meant by illegal.
I believe your number one reason is incorrect. Look at how many accidents occur with older, experienced pilots.
Mk IV's and similar gliders were ok (one of the gliders I currently own is a Mk IV), but the newer gliders are much better. _________________ Paul H
U2 160 USHPA # 51178 KE7VOG
H4, FL, AT, PL, FSL, RLF, TUR, X-C, CL, AWCL, 360, HA,
USN ret. A & P mechanic |
|
|
|
CAL 3 thumbs up


Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 3464 Location: OGDEN, UT
|
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:21 pm Post subject: |
#20 |
though i would love to share a hang gliding experience with others as i have done before the rating system. i see several pilots coming up, young and old, i think we need ratings, but once you are rated and are current you shouldn't have to be observed again to keep your rating as a tandem pilot and there should be someone that can rate you in your region but that would cut money out of those tandem pilots that make a living at it so, maybe it is a good idea to keep things the way they are, another issue would be our insurance could get more out of hand then it is, _________________ Explore nature from the eyes of an Eagle |
|
|
|
|