| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
Mavi Gogun 1 thumbs up


Joined: 26 Jun 2009 Posts: 973 Location: Istanbul (not Constantinople)
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:48 am Post subject: min sink and VG |
#1 |
| Tightening the sail reduces twist in the wing, presenting more of the wing simultaneously at a flying attitude. So, doesn't this mean that the slowest min sink (not "air speed") a glider is capable of may be had with the VG fully pulled, sail tight? |
|
|
|
tom emery 3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Sep 2011 Posts: 639 Location: san diego
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:02 am Post subject: Ok |
#2 |
Sounds right to me. (14 solos, low air time.)
On another note, could you explain "polar"?
I keep hearing this word and although I have an idea of the definition, I am still not clear.
Thanks. |
|
|
|
Mavi Gogun 1 thumbs up


Joined: 26 Jun 2009 Posts: 973 Location: Istanbul (not Constantinople)
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:39 am Post subject: Re: Ok |
#3 |
| tom emery wrote: |
| On another note, could you explain "polar"? |
Typically, it is expressed as a graph of the sink rate of the glider compared to speed across the range; this appears as a curve.
Examination of the polar will reveal key speeds for achieving flying goals- such as flying at the speed that features the slowest descent rate, or the speed that delivers the best glide ratio.
The polar is unique for each wing, and impacted by pilot weight and equipment drag. Advanced flight computers are capable of recording polar data in order to supply best glide calculations for conditions- sink, lift, wind -and to provide estimations of arrival altitude for a target at varying speeds. Typically, this comes in the form of an indicator to fly faster or slower for optimal glide, with a digital result projected. |
|
|
|
tom emery 3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Sep 2011 Posts: 639 Location: san diego
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:06 am Post subject: Airspeed indicator |
#4 |
I am currently flying without an airspeed indicator. I notice most pilots also fly without one. So, is this "polar" more of a template of the design charictaristics set down on paper as opposed to actual speeds you should "best" fly the glider?
Is the airspeed indicator coupled with a thorough understanding (memorization) of the "polar" going to help make me a better pilot, or is it more of a general layout of the handling characteristics of the glider?
I was told that an indicator was not really necessary. More important to listen and feel the wind. |
|
|
|
Mavi Gogun 1 thumbs up


Joined: 26 Jun 2009 Posts: 973 Location: Istanbul (not Constantinople)
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:38 am Post subject: Re: Airspeed indicator |
#5 |
| tom emery wrote: |
| I am currently flying without an airspeed indicator. I notice most pilots also fly without one. So, is this "polar" more of a template of the design charictaristics set down on paper as opposed to actual speeds you should "best" fly the glider? |
You can use a polar supplied by the manufacturer, or another pilot- but it won't be as accurate as one you sample. If you want the best approximation, it has to come from your gear. If you are able to take minimum sink and best glide estimates from the manufacturer or another pilot, borrow an air speed indicator for one flight and memorize the bar position for those speeds; you will then have a fair approximation that you can reproduce without an instrument.
| tom emery wrote: |
| I Is the airspeed indicator coupled with a thorough understanding (memorization) of the "polar" going to help make me a better pilot*snip*? |
Memorization of the polar will be of little consequence, me thinks- but having a grasp of where minimum sink and best glide are will most definitely help you achieve your flying goals (maximizing lift, reaching a distant target). Experience might make your guesses outside of those points more effective- but feed back and confirmation from an instrument will help hone that judgment. In calm air, best glide is easy. How about in 350 foot per minute sink? How much faster than best glide will provide the best travel over the ground? At what speed will you be shortening your glide? What about at 500 foot per minute? 600? Head wind? Tail? |
|
|
|
psuguru 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Aug 2010 Posts: 378 Location: The Darkest Hinterlands of Essex
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:49 am Post subject: Re: Airspeed indicator |
#6 |
| tom emery wrote: |
I am currently flying without an airspeed indicator. I notice most pilots also fly without one. So, is this "polar" more of a template of the design charictaristics set down on paper as opposed to actual speeds you should "best" fly the glider?
Is the airspeed indicator coupled with a thorough understanding (memorization) of the "polar" going to help make me a better pilot, or is it more of a general layout of the handling characteristics of the glider?
I was told that an indicator was not really necessary. More important to listen and feel the wind. |
It's really only going to be of importance to you if you're going XC, and possibly only then if you're competing.
As Christopher (Mavi) writes, once you've tagged what the bar pressures are like for given speeds, then you're mostly there. What becomes an issue for competition work is knowing what your average thermal performance has been and how that translates into a speed to fly for best range or best time over goal. This is known as "McCready theory". Instruments to give you a speed, based upon the glider's performance curves and local atmospherics are expensive and I bet most people don't get their money's worth out of them. _________________ "We should all have our heads examined"
"That's Rule Number 4"
CP Hill, CP Tow. Moyes Malibu 188. |
|
|
|
Jason 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 7533 Location: Stapleton, Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:56 am Post subject: |
#7 |
even on a T2c i don't think its really necessary to use the polar, the absolute best still air glide you would get is about 15:1....... and in any kind of sink headwind that is going to drop rapidly and you will be able to see/judge your glide if you are anywhere near the ground..
as to the original question, when i flew torrey in my sensor i found i would get higher with the VG full tight..... _________________ TSA, DHS, NDAA and SOPA Seig Heil! |
|
|
|
ChattaroyMan 3 thumbs up


Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1803 Location: Chattaroy, WA -USA
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:09 am Post subject: Re: min sink and VG |
#8 |
| Mavi Gogun wrote: |
| Tightening the sail reduces twist in the wing, presenting more of the wing simultaneously at a flying attitude. So, doesn't this mean that the slowest min sink (not "air speed") a glider is capable of may be had with the VG fully pulled, sail tight? |
Makes sense unless the increased speed of full VG yields enough drag to impact sink rate. At least that's what pops into my mellon.
In getting up and staying up in thermal conditions primarily (not ridge lift) I've been flying at all sorts of speeds and VG settings (experimenting). If I'm flying slow, and with low to no VG, it is more for staying in a lifting area longer than it is to get minimum sink. But, since thermals can be rowdy I more often fly with a bit of VG on for both 1) flying at a comfy speed above stall and, 2) to have easier roll control while banked in a turn. Whatever keeps me in the thermal is where I'm at. Once I get better at flying my wing in thermals I'll try flying it more efficiently (getting a better sink rate while in a thermal). That will likely require flying it so that I average a slower speed while in the thermal. _________________ U2 160 • Chattaroy, WA - USA |
|
|
|
Mavi Gogun 1 thumbs up


Joined: 26 Jun 2009 Posts: 973 Location: Istanbul (not Constantinople)
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:26 am Post subject: Re: min sink and VG |
#9 |
| ChattaroyMan wrote: |
| Makes sense unless the increased speed of full VG yields enough drag to impact sink rate. |
Profile drag increases, induced drag (from trailing edge down wash) decreases with speed. We exploit the sweet spot between these. I'm skeptical that the minor difference in minimum sink speed with a tight sail would more than offset the benefit of a more efficient profile- it certainly doesn't on the other end of the speed range... |
|
|
|
Lucky_Chevy 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 May 2008 Posts: 76 Location: Alexandria, Virginia
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:05 am Post subject: |
#10 |
Based on my experience VG does not significantly impact the minimum sink of the glider. It is a tool to improve your best glide performance.
Very little is gained If you pull on full VG and fly at trim. For my glider, full VG and pulled in 3-4" will give me best glide. Performance will vary considerable based on glider design and glider loading.
Of course that's just my opinion....I could be wrong  |
|
|
|
Hangskier 3 thumbs up


Joined: 10 Jan 2011 Posts: 852 Location: Eastern NC, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:23 am Post subject: |
#11 |
Here's a question? And I know gliders differ, but in general, modern advanced king post or topless glider...... Is best glide achieved by 1/2 VG pulling in 5-6" or 3/4 VG pulling in 4-5" or full VG pulling in 3-4", or does speed play more of a roll? _________________ Aspiring Pilot for LIfe and Focused
1st Flight/Solo Nov 1993 |
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:38 am Post subject: |
#12 |
VG is not as complicated as you guys are making it sound...
VG pulls the sail tighter by spreading the crossbars, widening the nose angle, and giving you (slightly) more span.
A tight wing with very little twist and more span is more efficient than a washed out wing, loose sail, and less span.
Look at a Sport 2 and a U2 and you can see the difference.
Now... the part that gets tricky is that the wing gets harder to control with more VG. If you have too much and can't fly it straight (either roll or yaw) you'd be better served with less VG. The wing will still be less efficient, but if you can fly it straight the end result will net better performance.
One other caveat- on some gliders the trim speed changes as you pull VG and remove washout. Min sink is usually about as slow as you can go before the onset of stall. Not actually stalling, just the onset of stall, where the first portion of the wing stops flying. There's usually a yarn tuft in this spot and you should be able to see it in flight. On these gliders with transient trim, you might have to push out a little to fly min sink. At this speed and this much VG, the glider will be basically uncontrollable... so again, maybe it's not the most efficient in the end.
But in terms of aerodynamics... full VG is the most efficient your wing will get- AT ANY SPEED.... _________________ Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG |
|
|
|
FormerFF 3 thumbs up


Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 2482 Location: Roswell, Georgia, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:02 am Post subject: Re: Airspeed indicator |
#13 |
| tom emery wrote: |
I am currently flying without an airspeed indicator. I notice most pilots also fly without one. So, is this "polar" more of a template of the design charictaristics set down on paper as opposed to actual speeds you should "best" fly the glider?
Is the airspeed indicator coupled with a thorough understanding (memorization) of the "polar" going to help make me a better pilot, or is it more of a general layout of the handling characteristics of the glider?
I was told that an indicator was not really necessary. More important to listen and feel the wind. |
You should get an airspeed indicator. Small differences in airspeed make a big difference in sink rate and the ASI will help you. When you have 50 or 100 flights you may not need it anymore, but at this point you should have one. |
|
|
|
Bobfly 3 thumbs up


Joined: 13 Nov 2009 Posts: 3699 Location: San Diego, Ca.
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:00 am Post subject: |
#14 |
I use a hall airspeed indicator on my Freedom and one thing it did help with was when I slowed to trim speed or just above it (the bar was still pulling out slightly) I was at 15mph. The wing appeared to fly quite happily at that speed but I have been told it should trim around 17mph meaning I need to move the hang point forward to tune for my weight. Never would have known that without the asi. It's a good cheap investment. It's also good to know exactly what speed your wings stall occurs at. _________________ Freedom 170 FR |
|
|
|
tom emery 3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Sep 2011 Posts: 639 Location: san diego
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:16 pm Post subject: Thanks |
#15 |
| Thanks everyone for the helpful information. Think I'll get me an ASI, study polars for the Wills Wing Falcon III 195 and try to maximize my airtime. |
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:19 pm Post subject: Re: Thanks |
#16 |
| tom emery wrote: |
| Thanks everyone for the helpful information. Think I'll get me an ASI, study polars for the Wills Wing Falcon III 195 and try to maximize my airtime. |
Note that polars shift with wingloading, they'll be slightly different for everyone (some more slightly than others) _________________ Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG |
|
|
|
danmoser 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 276 Location: Sandy, Utah
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:40 pm Post subject: |
#17 |
There is a certain optimum amount of wing twist which minimizes induced drag at a given angle of attack.
So the general trend is:
To get the lowest sink rate (high angle of attack), use a greater amount of twist.. in other words, looser VG.
To get the best glide at high airspeeds (low angle of attack), it is advantageous to use less twist -- that is -- VG tight.
Where the exact VG setting lies to get the absolute lowest sink rate is different for each pilot/glider combination.
At VG tight, some of the hotter wings are stall/spin-prone when flying slow, and turning becomes more difficult at all airspeeds.
So, scratching next to the hill in punchy lift with one of these wings should NOT be done with tight VG, as it is easier to lose control of the glider's direction at the very time when you have the least amount of room to recover.
Chances are the looser VG settings are giving you just as good or better minimum sink rate anyway, so you get spin resistance & better handling for free !!.
Highly skilled pilots might get away with scratching at VG tight .. but make no mistake.. there is a much slimmer margin for error !!!.. and the Earth shall rise up and smite thee.  _________________ Happy landings,
Dan Moser
Saturn 167, Predator 158, HES Cocoon, Bright Star SWIFT #37
Flying HGs (off & on) since 1975 |
|
|
|
|