| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
lostgriz 3 thumbs up


Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 1928 Location: Virginia
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:53 am Post subject: Landing Concerns |
#1 |
If there is someone that you know that needs help with their landings, take it upon yourself to make sure they are aware of their issues. Be sensitive in your approach and enlist the support of other pilots for an intervention if necessary. It may be difficult for you to approach someone in this regard, but if the need is there, do not ignore it and be firm. Your efforts could save someone a downtube, a helicopter ride or their life. In fact, even if you don't know them well, I believe you have an obligation to speak up as a member of this great flying community.
There have been a few accidents recently due to bad landings. Two pilots that I know personally are currently in recovery from injuries sustained during bad landings last week. One pilot had to be taken to the hospital via helicopter and the last I heard was still in critical condition.
If you are not 100% confident in your landings, please get some help immediately. Landing should be a very gratifying part of your flight, not a source of anxiety. There are plenty of great instructors out there that can help you get dialed in on your landings. Do whatever it takes to get your landings tight before your next flying adventure. Mitch Shipley does landing clinics with his ET system and Steve Wendt is the man with scooter towing. Both of these methods are great ways to get lots of landing practice in quickly. I also highly recommend having someone film your landings and/or having a wing mounted camera to analyze what you are ACTUALLY doing. If you can't afford to go to them, organize a landing clinic with your local pilots and bring the instructor to you. Seriously, make arrangements with one of the great landing instructors and bring them to you. Spend a day, two days, a week or whatever it takes to develop consistent safe approach and landing practices.
Most of you are more experienced than I, so I humbly make this post with the hope that it will be heard by those that know they need a little extra help in this regard. Please make this your main priority with regard to your flying progression. If it means stepping back in performance, by all means please do so. Some of the newer pilots have yet to develop the skills to land well and some of the more experienced pilots have gotten rusty as they spend more time in the air with fewer landings.
If you have taken the time to read this entire post, please make an immediate commitment to improve your landing skills so that you are confidently and consistently landing safely. Also, please make a commitment to helping keep those around you safe by working with pilots who need help, to make sure that they get it ASAP. We should all be confident in our landings before we worry about soaring and DEFINITELY before you consider going XC.
Sincerely,
Matt _________________ Wills Wing U2 160
"Better to have a shorter life that is full of what you enjoy doing, than a long life spent in a miserable way." - Alan Watts
http://vimeo.com/27531088# |
|
|
|
CAL 3 thumbs up


Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 3464 Location: OGDEN, UT
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:20 am Post subject: |
#2 |
good write up ! landings have always been tricky event for most of us, well ok me.
just about the time i think i have got it down, i always have that one landing that gets me to realize that i need to always work on them, i have seen this with other pilots as well, excluding Ryan, he is the only pilot that i have flown with considerably and didn't see the landing woe hit occasionally, i don't think i will ever get 100% confident on any aspect of my flying, but that's what i like about this sport it keeps this proud male humble, every time i get to think i am getting good at a certain aspect is when i my glider talks back to me and says, YOU THINK ! better think again Cal, i just forgave you for that half a launch you just made, good thing i have such a good glide ratio so you could find that thermal that just spit you out, holy crap Cal, how many time must i forgive you for making a stupid landing approach, don't you remember i glide a long ways in ground effect, Crap i screamed flare how much louder must i screem  _________________ Explore nature from the eyes of an Eagle |
|
|
|
gpwrinkled 3 thumbs up


Joined: 23 Oct 2011 Posts: 143 Location: Mesa, AZ
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:28 am Post subject: |
#3 |
Great point, and also applicable to our responsibility to speak up and help a fellow pilot if launches are seen as being unsafe. In either scenario (launches or landings) it seems it's our fear of offending that keeps us from speaking up.
So to that end I'll mention a recent experience that may help others to have the confidence to speak up. For some time I have been concerned with the launch techniques of a certain pilot that is a fellow pilot but not a close friend. Therefore I was hesitant to speak up and provide some input. But it got to a point after one launch that I determined it had become a situation where if I didn't speak up he was going to blow a launch with, as we know, serious or fatal consequences. I decided that it was more important that he have the input even at the potential expense of damaging a relationship. So I wrote him a note and tried to make it as friendly as possible, but it was direct and contained detailed descriptions of what was being done wrong and suggestions for how to do it right.
He wrote back and expressed his agreement and appreciation, which was really great. But even if he had not and was upset, at least I had done what I could to help. I would not want to be in the post-fatality situation for the rest of my life thinking "... if I had spoken up would he still be alive?"
We are all in this together, which is a great thing about this sport and the pilots in it. None are perfect, we all can improve, so I try to also flip that a bit and recognize that others want to improve as well and that helps me to speak up and offer suggestions when it seems appropriate...
There are no topics on this forum more important than those that keep us alive! Thanks for bringing this one up !  _________________ Greg Porter ---- http://www.youtube.com/gpwrinkled ---- gpwrinkled@hotmail.com ---- www.azhpa.org
" If it tastes good, spit it out..." Jack Lalane
T2C 144, U2 145, <28 year break & 5 kids!>, Moyes Mega II, Phoenix 6D, Standard Rogallo, tricycle, crib... |
|
|
|
pjwings 3 thumbs up


Joined: 20 Aug 2009 Posts: 2006 Location: Tennessee
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:52 am Post subject: Re: Landing Concerns |
#4 |
| lostgriz wrote: |
| Landing should be a very gratifying part of your flight, not a source of anxiety. |
I've been on both sides of the equation above. I enjoy flying so much more when I anticipate a good landing. _________________ http://pjwings.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
J Williams 3 thumbs up

Joined: 07 Oct 2010 Posts: 53 Location: Kingman, Arizona
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:44 am Post subject: |
#5 |
| After reading Cals's post I thought I would pitch my 2 cents. First off I am only an H2 and do I need more work on my landings? You bet! Before I was an H! and was standing with Rob at AJX watching pilots come in for a landing they were coming in almost regularly whacking if not outright pounding in. I told myself "This is what I have to look forward to?" Back to Cal's remark. He said he screamed FLAIR. Maybe thats what we should be doing when we land. Yes it sounds goofy to me too but before pilots yelled clear they probably sounded a little goofy. |
|
|
|
peanuts 3 thumbs up


Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Posts: 1880 Location: virginia
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:21 am Post subject: |
#6 |
| J Williams wrote: |
| After reading Cals's post ....... He said he screamed FLAIR..... |
i think Cal said HIS GLIDER screamed "FLAIR" stupid minor point when compared to the overall seriousness and importance of the issue at hand, |
|
|
|
flybop 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Apr 2010 Posts: 648 Location: Livingston, Montana
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:26 am Post subject: |
#7 |
First off, I hope your friends will recover to fly again. If and when you get more info and the people involved agree, please keep us posted.
A non pilot friend who has been on launch with my flying buddies and I a couple of times remarked about how seriosly we take this, how helpful everyone is and how patient we are. He was most impressed at how freely we all were to relate mistakes to each other so we can all learn from them.
While I feel safe and confident in my landings I realize that there is room for improvement. Learning to soar (or beginning to learn) is a priority for me this year. However, I do know that a great soaring flight is worthless if it ends in a bad landing.
Your post made me think of a pilot from another state who I have flown with a few times. He is an amazing soaring and XC pilot, however, he can not land safely consistently. During set up and on launch he is openly dreading landing. My question with a pilot like this is, "How do they earn a H4 when they can not land safely?" _________________ What a beautiful day! Let's go jump off a mountain!!!
H3 FL, CL, RLF, FSL, TUR |
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:58 am Post subject: |
#8 |
| flybop wrote: |
| "How do they earn a H4 when they can not land safely?" |
It's easy enough to log in to the USHPA site and look up a member's rating card... which will tell you who gave them that rating.
We're a self-regulated sport... and unless we perform our own checks and balances on things like this, it weakens our entire rating system's credibility.
As an instructor, I would ABSOLUTELY want to know if someone with my name on their card wasn't living up to the expectations or requirements. Then I, as the issuing official, would have some leverage to say "hey, you either need to fix this, or you're going to lose that rating". I'd bet that would light a fire under someone's ass to get their landings in order by any means necessary!
FWIW- My name is on Cal's card, and he does land consistently well.... he's just very critical of himself, which makes for a safer pilot IMO. The landings of his that I've seen go less-than-perfect had little to do with his landing technique and much to do with the conditions he was landing in. Really strong post-frontal North Side days come to mind, when the flying is great and landings are ridiculously challenging. I rarely fly on those days anymore.... just no fun to have to land in that crap. That's why Cal doesn't see me have bad landings
He'll learn  _________________ Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG |
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
|
|
|
CAL 3 thumbs up


Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 3464 Location: OGDEN, UT
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:48 am Post subject: |
#10 |
| AIRTHUG wrote: |
| flybop wrote: |
| "How do they earn a H4 when they can not land safely?" |
It's easy enough to log in to the USHPA site and look up a member's rating card... which will tell you who gave them that rating.
We're a self-regulated sport... and unless we perform our own checks and balances on things like this, it weakens our entire rating system's credibility.
As an instructor, I would ABSOLUTELY want to know if someone with my name on their card wasn't living up to the expectations or requirements. Then I, as the issuing official, would have some leverage to say "hey, you either need to fix this, or you're going to lose that rating". I'd bet that would light a fire under someone's ass to get their landings in order by any means necessary!
FWIW- My name is on Cal's card, and he does land consistently well.... he's just very critical of himself, which makes for a safer pilot IMO. The landings of his that I've seen go less-than-perfect had little to do with his landing technique and much to do with the conditions he was landing in. Really strong post-frontal North Side days come to mind, when the flying is great and landings are ridiculously challenging. I rarely fly on those days anymore.... just no fun to have to land in that crap. That's why Cal doesn't see me have bad landings
He'll learn  |
since weather is part of the landing i think it would be fun or good to talk about weather and conditions,
you have got to remember that we (I) are(am) not as good in determining conditions however do understand about post frontal days and midday landings, i put we because several pilots where flying one day including you, you made a comment, make sure you take off in a good cycle and stick with it, don't leave a thermal expecting ridge lift to back you up and if you do happen to be forced to land, it will be rough, then you launched skied out and landed in the evening when things cooled down,
the rest of us did as you said we launched in a good cycle stayed with the thermal and as soon as we saw that we were at bench altitude left the thermal and headed for the upper bench ridge lift, at our surprise there was no ridge lift like there usually is on a light day, sinking out into thermic landing conditions we all realized what you meant by sticking with the thermal, not just there would be no ridge lift at the bench but there would be no ridge lift on steep mnt as well, this is very unusual i have only seen this happen this day !
i might add that there was a pilot flying that day that is very good at weather and gets it right several times who made the same mistake as the rest of us. Ryan was the only pilot that that nailed it
i hope this is not off topic, but as Ryan said picking your conditions is critical, i just can't resist the great flying, which shows you how good Ryan knows the pilots he flies with, when it comes to HG he certainly knows, before launching what he is launching into and knows what he will be landing in and how long he needs to stay up and knows how to stay up until the landing is good.
so you can see that there is much more then good landing techniques to successfully nail your landings every time _________________ Explore nature from the eyes of an Eagle |
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:25 am Post subject: |
#11 |
Not trying to argue Cal... But I don't launch thinking I can stay up until X o'clock when landing will be nicer. Sometimes I very much hope I can! But if I wasn't confident I could perform a quality landing in the conditions at that time, I wouldn't be launching. Doesn't mean I'll ENJOY the landing, but I have the confidence that I can use my knowledge and skills tol reliably get me down safely.
I personally find thermic landings lower risk than turbulent (mechanical) landings, which is what we get on those strong N side nights... If I do fly in it, it's usually on a Falcon!
Completely avoiding risk is still a failure in risk management
But why are we talking about me??? Matt created a great topic here, let's stick with that! _________________ Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG |
|
|
|
CAL 3 thumbs up


Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 3464 Location: OGDEN, UT
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:29 am Post subject: |
#12 |
| AIRTHUG wrote: |
Not trying to argue Cal... But I don't launch thinking I can stay up until X o'clock when landing will be nicer. Sometimes I very much hope I can! But if I wasn't confident I could perform a quality landing in the conditions at that time, I wouldn't be launching. Doesn't mean I'll ENJOY the landing, but I have the confidence that I can use my knowledge and skills tol reliably get me down safely.
I personally find thermic landings lower risk than turbulent (mechanical) landings, which is what we get on those strong N side nights... If I do fly in it, it's usually on a Falcon!
Completely avoiding risk is still a failure in risk management
But why are we talking about me??? Matt created a great topic here, let's stick with that! |
the topic is landing ! it is a great topic and you have a lot of the answers ! _________________ Explore nature from the eyes of an Eagle |
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:48 am Post subject: |
#13 |
| CAL wrote: |
| since weather is part of the landing i think it would be fun or good to talk about weather and conditions |
Getting back on topic, I think you're right... weather and conditions can certainly effect people's landing quality/consistency.
From what I've seen in this sport, the people than can set up an accurate approach (landing very near a target) and can perform a one-step or no-step landing in NO WIND seem to also be the most consistent landers in all variety of conditions. The precision and finesse required to do the above, in no wind, demonstrates a solid understanding of how to land, as well as the skill to execute.
Just as we see many people moving into gliders beyond their abilities, I would say that a lot of people fly in conditions beyond their abilities. Unless it's REALLY bad, launching is pretty easy... and flying, well there's nothing to hit, so they don't have to be that precise. But landing is when we see it. Maybe with a smooth steady headwind they can land like a champ, somewhere within a 40 acre field. But when it gets thermic or turbulent, or there's no wind at all, that's when we see the flaws in their technique.
I'm obviously a stickler on landings... they have to bee GREAT, every time, to call them safe. Few can do that (myself included)... but we do *TRY* to be safe, even if we don't succeed 100% of the time?
If I am able to teach first and second day students how to do a full-flare landing (at 5k ft msl), I don't see why anyone shouldn't be able to do it. It might take time, practice, work... but isn't safety worth it?
And until every landing is damn near perfect, maybe flying at 1:00 at a desert thermal site isn't so wise? In this regard, paragliding has it figured out. There is a CLEAR distinction between when you can fly in smooth air when when you can fly in big air... and most respect that line. In hang gliding, I see launching and landing as the evaluator of what conditions you should be flying in. I really don't care how well you thermal or how far you go or how upside down someone gets... if they can't land, it's hard to have any respect for them...
People that can stick a landing... I have a HUGE respect for. And I guarantee, even if they make it look easy, that respect was hard-earned through lots and lots of working toward perfection.
Now I'm sure that is quite enough from me.... I'll stop imposing myself or my ideals on this thread. Matt said it as well as anyone... Thank you for starting this thread  _________________ Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG |
|
|
|
lostgriz 3 thumbs up


Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 1928 Location: Virginia
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:01 pm Post subject: |
#14 |
I don't want to give the wrong impression with this thread. By no means do I think it is a requirement to nail no steppers every time to be considered a safe competent lander. Some of my landings are no steppers some are a few steppers and fewer require a little run, and a couple have been slightly worse than that. While I shoot for perfection in my landings, they usually miss the mark. Having said that, my goal is ALWAYS a spot and ALWAYS a perfect landing. If you have ever seen the movie The Patriot with Mel Gibson, there is a great saying in that movie that is applicable here as it is in many parts of life; "Aim small miss small." That has always been a key component to my landings and I am cussing myself for anything short of that. I think it will be very difficult for anyone to improve their landings if they become satisfied with "decent" landings.
I definitely didn't intend for this thread to become a "how to" on landings. My hope here is that as Pilots everyone will look at their last 50 landings and ask themselves the following questions:
1. Do I consistently land in control, within a close proximity to my intended spot, without my glider touching the ground until I have come to a complete stop and set it down?
2. Do I know someone who's landing skills are not in control, within a close proximity to their intended spot, without letting their glider touch the ground until they have come to a complete stop?
If you answer NO to the first question, will you take immediate and decisive steps to resolve your landing issues before investing any energy or resources into any other areas of hang gliding?
If you answer YES to the second question, will you commit to firmly and tactfully addressing your concerns with the pilot and or finding another pilot/pilots that will assist you in an intervention?
I suspect that there will be some who answer YES to the first question, that are actually flying in denial. Hopefully these pilots will be approached by others in the community to alert them of their concerns and help find ways to assist. If you are honest with yourself and aren't really sure how you would rate your landings, ask some well respected landers to give you some candid feedback. As it has been pointed out before, what we think we do, is sometimes very different from reality.
If you answer YES to the first question and your typical landings in moderate/light/nil wind do not include a round out with good speed into an extended glide in ground effect; then I would challenge that your landing skills have room for a critical improvement (we all have room for some improvement).
I am by no means perfect and defer on actual instruction to your local resources, but I felt strongly that this discussion needed to be had again. Hopefully it will make a difference for someone and we can all commit to being good citizens in this hang gliding community and watch out for the best interests of our fellow pilots; even if it means a little tough love. _________________ Wills Wing U2 160
"Better to have a shorter life that is full of what you enjoy doing, than a long life spent in a miserable way." - Alan Watts
http://vimeo.com/27531088# |
|
|
|
TomGalvin 3 thumbs up


Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 3548 Location: ............... Pagosa Springs, Colorado
|
|
|
|
NMERider 3 thumbs up


Joined: 07 Apr 2008 Posts: 7371
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:40 pm Post subject: |
#16 |
| AIRTHUG wrote: |
| ....But when it gets thermic or turbulent, or there's no wind at all, that's when we see the flaws in their technique.... |
This is in fact when we see that hang gliders have severe limitations in the degree to which they can be controlled regardless of how seemingly perfect the pilot's technique may appear in otherwise benign conditions. This is also where we see unequivocally that landing instruction should be offered in turbulent conditions and in dead air if we want to see accidents decrease.
If I wanted to play your crass games of busting chops than I would also posit that there is no evidence that all of your landing blather has ever made any measurable degree of difference in the overall rate of landing accidents in the USA. Trying to blame pilots' crashes on the bad influence of alleged bad examples is as big a cop out as you not daring to fly in conditions that could possibly make your landings look bad or what in fact your landings really are, and that is limited. Your landing abilities are limited.
Perfect technique is a myth:
Perfect landing skills are limited to smooth and predictable conditions. I think that it's no secret that even you would pound in just the the rest of us if you were faced with any real degree of turbulence. For his reason I suggest that you avoid attending attending real completions in real X/C soaring weather lest you want it known to the general public that you whacked and perish the thought--broke a downtube.
As long as you and others keep pedaling your Kool-Aid here and elsewhere, the numbers of injured pilots will either continue to grow or remain relatively unchanged. Until you and others completely rethink your approaches to both instruction and to your public relations, nothing will ever change. And don't feel that I'm picking on you personally because I'm not. You are hardly the first instructor or senior pilot who I have heard all the myths from before.
Hang gliders are inherently unsafe sporting equipment and have severe limitations. Anyone who begs to differ is either fooling himself or trying to fool others so they buy his wares. If landing instruction were given with this in mind then just maybe the numbers of accidents in injuries may be reduced measurably.
All anyone has to do is read Mike Meier's noteworthy article to see what he is talking about has as much to do with the limitations of hang gliders in less than ideal conditions as it does with practice and technique. http://www.willswing.com/Articles/Article.asp?reqArticleName=HandleOnSafety |
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:53 pm Post subject: |
#17 |
You can't do it, therefore it can't be done. Got it.
Thanks for that contribution to this discussion. _________________ Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG |
|
|
|
Jason 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 7533 Location: Stapleton, Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:18 pm Post subject: |
#18 |
| Quote: |
There are no accidents and no fatal flaws in the machines; there are only pilots with the wrong stuff.
— Tom Wolfe, 'The Right Stuff,' 1979. |
_________________ TSA, DHS, NDAA and SOPA Seig Heil! |
|
|
|
Jason 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 7533 Location: Stapleton, Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:28 pm Post subject: |
#19 |
| NMERider wrote: |
| http://www.willswing.com/Articles/Article.asp?reqArticleName=HandleOnSafety |
| Quote: |
| The overriding determinant of pilot safety in hang gliding is the quality of pilot decision making. Skill level, experience, quality of equipment; all those things are not determinants. What those things do is determine one's upper limits. More skill gives you a higher limit, as does more experience or better equipment. But safety is not a function of how high your limits are, but rather of how well you stay within those limits. And that, is determined by one thing; the quality of the decisions you make. And how good do those decisions have to be? Simply put, they have to be just about perfect. |
_________________ TSA, DHS, NDAA and SOPA Seig Heil! |
|
|
|
TomGalvin 3 thumbs up


Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 3548 Location: ............... Pagosa Springs, Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:31 pm Post subject: |
#20 |
| Marcus Aurelius wrote: |
| The wise man sees in the misfortune of others what he should avoid. |
_________________ Real freedom lies in wildness, not in civilization.
Charles Lindbergh |
|
|
|
|