| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
OSCAR 3 thumbs up


Joined: 12 Feb 2009 Posts: 753 Location: Long Beach,Ca
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:51 pm Post subject: |
#21 |
Sounds good to me, this is what I do,If there's no wind I hold the glider up with a grapevine grip strap tight ,grip firm just enough to hold up the glider,and as I feel the glider pulling me up I gradually release my grip to get some feed back from the glider but I wont change grips until I'm away from the mountain.now in turbulence ,I'll let the glider fly up to launch before I'm hooked in just to feel things out .but once I'm hooked in I'll keep the hang strap tight and My grip tight ,wings level I don't let the glider fly where it wants to.It's to easy to blow a launch .I also keep the same grip in the same place well into my launch .I won't Hand transition until I'm out of the danger Zone and in clear air .There's lots of Different techniques.Mine works for me.
_________________ Oscar H-6 FL-AWCL-CL-FSL-RLF-TUR-
Falcon 2-225
Horizon ET 180
UP Dream 220 |
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:56 pm Post subject: |
#22 |
| gluesniffer wrote: |
| Starting with a higher angle of attack gets the kite flying earlier. The earlier the straps are tight the sooner we have better control of the wing. The sooner the kite starts to lift the pilot, the faster our run becomes and the sooner we launch safely. |
I think you are confused here. Yes, launching with a higher angle of attack may get the glider to lift up off your shoulders (and get your hang strap tight) sooner... but that does not mean it will get you FLYING sooner. An exagerated example is that you could rest your keel on the ground and run forward until your hang straps are tight.... good luck getting FLYING that way.
Launching a hang glider is like getting up on water skis... you want the glider to lift up and plateau as soon as possible. Pulling a glider with too high of an AofA is like keeping your legs straight and fighting against the pull of the rope. You'll never get up that way...
| gluesniffer wrote: |
| Dreamer does this, gets the straps tight, pulls in a little and booyaaa- a smooth no wind launch. |
You must not be watching closely enough. Pause the video as he flies away, and tell me if you see him pulling in, or pushing out? Also, watch what the glider does as he puts his weight in it, does it fly away 'smoothly', or does it sink or dip in order to pick up more speed before he flies away.
When I pause it at that last step, I see a glider diving for speed even with the pilot is pushing out... it happens to be a steep enough launch with enough room to allow for this, and a forgiving enough glider to 'get away' with this even in these conditions.
And in response to the comments that foot launching in no-wind is in any way like 'russian-roulette'... get real. Yes, wind makes launching more forgiving. Wind will allow someone to get off the hill fairly reliably even with a couple minor flaws in their technique. No wind exemplifies flaws in technique... or another way to say it, no wind requires proper technique.
To say that no-wind launches is risky, when using proper technique, would be a lie. Instead, I think you are making the statement, 'I know I don't have proper technique, therefore I don't launch in no wind'. There's nothing wrong with admitting you don't have proper technique... in a sport like hang gliding, if you don't know your limitations, you're in for a rude awakening...
_________________ Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG |
|
|
|
Wingspan34 2 thumbs up


Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 5652 Location: Central NY
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:10 pm Post subject: |
#23 |
| flyhigh013 wrote: |
. . . And in response to the comments that foot launching in no-wind is in any way like 'russian-roulette'... get real. Yes, wind makes launching more forgiving. Wind will allow someone to get off the hill fairly reliably even with a couple minor flaws in their technique. No wind exemplifies flaws in technique... or another way to say it, no wind requires proper technique.
To say that no-wind launches is risky, when using proper technique, would be a lie. Instead, I think you are making the statement, 'I know I don't have proper technique, therefore I don't launch in no wind'. There's nothing wrong with admitting you don't have proper technique... in a sport like hang gliding, if you don't know your limitations, you're in for a rude awakening... |
Ryan, this was my statement. BTW - I have very solid launch technique so I'm not in for any "rude awakening".
The Russian-Roulette comment had to do with the possibility (under any but obvious and perfectly calm conditions) of an even mild cross, cross and down, or simple down wind cycle kicking in as a pilot begins their launch run.
The average glider launches at an air speed of 15 - 18 mph. Add 2 - 5 mph down wind to that figure and a pilot must run at 17 mph (in the best case of 2 mph down wind on a slow launching glider) to 23 mph in the worst case (5 mph down wind on a blade wing).
A pilot might pull off the best case with a slow stall speed single surface glider. But in an Intermediate to advanced wing even a minor tail wind can require a pilot to run faster than they are capable - even down a nice slope. That's where my Russian-Roulette comment came from. And remember, even in Russian-Roulette, you have pretty good odds that you won't hit the single bullet in the chamber. But why risk it?
As far as light cross winds or cross and down winds that could cycle through on an otherwise calm day . . . They may not effect (or effect much) the required running speed leading to launch, but they can have an impact on the wing's balance during a launch run and end up pushing a tip into the dirt and cartwheeling the glider and pilot back into launch. That's not fun.
Basically, launching in no wind creates a situation where the glider/pilot are attempting to fly at the most marginal (lower) edge of the glider/pilot's performance. Even if said pilot has PERFECT form.
Everyone should remember that when hang gliders are close to the ground and flying at near stall speed, it is there that you have one of the most dangerous situations possible. We frequently hear, "On approach (to landing), always make sure you have lots of air speed!" don't we?
Well, . . . on take off, since we begin with ZERO ground speed every time, the only way to increase the safety factor is to launch with at least some upward moving wind. Otherwise, just like flying slow on final into an LZ, we are flying slow near the ground - often along rough downward slopping ground. That sounds like a crappy place to land if something goes wrong. So, why again is flying with a slow air speed near the ground at launch a GOOD thing?
It isn't. That's why it should be avoided.
_________________ WW 141 Fusion SP
Master rated, First flight - May 1975
FL, PL, PA, AWCL, CL, FSL, RLF, TURB, X-C
Last edited by Wingspan34 on Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:12 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
Paul H 2 thumbs up


Joined: 13 May 2008 Posts: 2185 Location: Reno, NV
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:12 pm Post subject: |
#24 |
Your wings should be balanced which will not necessarily mean they will be level.
| OSCAR wrote: |
Sounds good to me, this is what I do,If there's no wind I hold the glider up with a grapevine grip strap tight ,grip firm just enough to hold up the glider,and as I feel the glider pulling me up I gradually release my grip to get some feed back from the glider but I wont change grips until I'm away from the mountain.now in turbulence ,I'll let the glider fly up to launch before I'm hooked in just to feel things out .but once I'm hooked in I'll keep the hang strap tight and My grip tight ,wings level I don't let the glider fly where it wants to.It's to easy to blow a launch .I also keep the same grip in the same place well into my launch .I won't Hand transition until I'm out of the danger Zone and in clear air .There's lots of Different techniques.Mine works for me.  |
_________________ Paul H
U2 160 USHPA # 51178 KE7VOG
H4, FL, AT, PL, FSL, RLF, TUR, X-C, CL, AWCL, 360, HA,
USN ret. A & P mechanic |
|
|
|
gluesniffer 3 thumbs up

Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 548
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:28 pm Post subject: |
#25 |
ryan said
| Quote: |
I think you are confused here. Yes, launching with a higher angle of attack may get the glider to lift up off your shoulders (and get your hang strap tight) sooner... but that does not mean it will get you FLYING sooner. An exagerated example is that you could rest your keel on the ground and run forward until your hang straps are tight.... good luck getting FLYING that way. |
no i am not confused. It is good you brought up the exaggerated keel start scenario, which I have seen successfully demonstrated. In light winds there is no danger of getting wiped off launch if you walk up with a high AOA or even starting launch with the keel touching the ground. I am not saying one keeps the high angle of attack through the run or you will plow like your waterskiing scenario. However a high AOA gets the wing flying sooner and immediately pulling in to the trim position after getting the the straps tight is the quickest way to get the kite flying. The sooner the wing is flying, the better. The sooner the wing is flying one can perform a hands free launch, which I have done. There is no reason to pull in once the kite is at trim during the launch run, just extend the strides and yes you will be off the ground sooner and arguably safer than a launch where you are pulling in and running yourself down the hill.
As far as dreamer pulling in or pushing out after his last step, I didn't see it and I watched it again since you called me confused. His AOA looked pretty steady as well as his level and straight flight out from the hill.
So, unconfused, I still have to say
NIce fukin launch dreamer!
|
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:35 pm Post subject: |
#26 |
to each his own I guess... my opinion is stated... readers can pick and choose for themselves what they see/believe/practice...
_________________ Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG |
|
|
|
day dreamer 2 thumbs up


Joined: 04 Dec 2007 Posts: 3754 Location: McClure Pilot
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:42 pm Post subject: |
#27 |
YOu know guys, I like the discussion my vid created. I will say that I agree with Oscar,and Jspin. In LOW WIND situations. I haven't been flying with this harness too long, so I will keep what you guys are saying in mind. But I also agree with Wingspan in the fact that at least at McClure, if there is little or no wind, I just don't like the risk of what could happen if I didn't get off that hill. I chose to fly because I thought it would be good to have experience to be able to do a launch in such conditions there. Don't wan't to make it a regular thing, but if I'm feeling froggy. Now at a place like edlevin, I don't think I would be so apprehensive about doing such a launch. I am trying to find the best out of this harness, and trying to make it as comfortable as my Z-4 was. And I will try to pay better attention to my AoA if that is what is seen. I still can't get past that part where my strap goes tight, and the glider does dive a bit. But to me it looks like to AoA was affected because of that. I did think my AoA was correct for the conditions. I also think that the back plate is another thing I have to get used to as well. But it's all good!! I got the next two years before the end of the world to get it right!! By then my samurai will need sharpening! And I have got some of the best mentors around me to help.
_________________ Always a student.
"The mountain doesn't care what that card in your wallet says." - Bruce Stobbe
Last edited by day dreamer on Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:50 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
OSCAR 3 thumbs up


Joined: 12 Feb 2009 Posts: 753 Location: Long Beach,Ca
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:50 pm Post subject: |
#28 |
| Paul H wrote: |
Your wings should be balanced which will not necessarily mean they will be level.
| OSCAR wrote: |
Sounds good to me, this is what I do,If there's no wind I hold the glider up with a grapevine grip strap tight ,grip firm just enough to hold up the glider,and as I feel the glider pulling me up I gradually release my grip to get some feed back from the glider but I wont change grips until I'm away from the mountain.now in turbulence ,I'll let the glider fly up to launch before I'm hooked in just to feel things out .but once I'm hooked in I'll keep the hang strap tight and My grip tight ,wings level I don't let the glider fly where it wants to.It's to easy to blow a launch .I also keep the same grip in the same place well into my launch .I won't Hand transition until I'm out of the danger Zone and in clear air .There's lots of Different techniques.Mine works for me.  |
|
Well My wing will be loaded evenly pointed towards the wind and as level as I can get them watching the horizon When I start my launch.is what I try to do.
_________________ Oscar H-6 FL-AWCL-CL-FSL-RLF-TUR-
Falcon 2-225
Horizon ET 180
UP Dream 220 |
|
|
|
gluesniffer 3 thumbs up

Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 548
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:01 pm Post subject: |
#29 |
you guys lifting your wings up must have arms like popeye. LIft all you want, you will feel less when you do however, but then guys built like popeye don't care about stinkin feelings
|
|
|
|
OSCAR 3 thumbs up


Joined: 12 Feb 2009 Posts: 753 Location: Long Beach,Ca
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:18 pm Post subject: |
#30 |
Thats right ,We just muscle that wing around and put it where we want it....Right .
_________________ Oscar H-6 FL-AWCL-CL-FSL-RLF-TUR-
Falcon 2-225
Horizon ET 180
UP Dream 220 |
|
|
|
GuitarPilot 3 thumbs up


Joined: 15 Feb 2009 Posts: 208 Location: Bay Point, CA.
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:25 am Post subject: |
#31 |
I don't see the nose pop or a dip. God that scares me if I'm not seeing something that is there. That looked like a very controlled and solid launch. Head and shoulders through the control frame. Could he have been pulled in anymore? Doesn't look like it. What am I not seeing? Maybe some one could give me a time lapse number ( example 0:31). If there is something wrong with this launch then I'm concerned about my launches. If your afraid of being rude PM me about it.
_________________ H-3, TUR, 360, ACP |
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:54 pm Post subject: |
#32 |
Perhaps this will help those that don't see what I'm talking about...
In the first image, I drew a line along the slope of the hill, and along the keel of the glider. The angle formed between these two lines represents his angle of attack, since he is running down that slope, that is the relative direction of airflow over the wing.
It might not look too bad, until you look at the second image, which I rotated until the ground angle is 'flat'. Now you can see that, if he were running on flat ground, that's a pretty high nose angle. There's a whole intricate explanation of how lower performing (single surface) gliders can have a high nose angle (measured at the keel), because they have more reflex. But this is a U2, not a very high-twist glider...
In the last image, taken just after he took his last step and he's flying (mushing) away... look at his arm extension. Look at the angle of his hang strap (this is where the glider feels his weight). He is pushing out to get off the hill.
Now watch the launch again, and focus on the part where he 'dives' away after running. He's not pulling in That is the glider diving to pick up speed because it is mushing (due to the high AofA).
Now obviously his AofA wasn't "TOO" high, or he wouldn't have made it off the hill. But I feel it was higher than appropriate, and if that exact same launch were performed in less wind, on a shallower slope with less room, and/or at higher altitude, it may not have looked so pretty.
I know my tone doesn't always come across the way I mean it to on the splinternet, but I'm trying to help and educate here (and apparently it's a lesson a lot more people need to learn, before they learn it the hard way)
Media BLOCKED
Please REGISTER and log in to see this content
|
Media BLOCKED
Please REGISTER and log in to see this content
|
Media BLOCKED
Please REGISTER and log in to see this content
|
_________________ Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG |
|
|
|
Paul H 2 thumbs up


Joined: 13 May 2008 Posts: 2185 Location: Reno, NV
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:22 pm Post subject: |
#33 |
Those pics are a perfect illustration for what we often try to explain to out of town pilots when they come here to fly at Slide Mt. Too many pilots just don't get it. They think the nose of their glider is really low when its even with or slightly above the horizon, but they are launching down a very steep slope and they end up running much further than they should have to. The horizon is not a good reference point for setting the pitch or bank angles of a glider when launching. The angle of the launch and the wind are the proper determining factors.
_________________ Paul H
U2 160 USHPA # 51178 KE7VOG
H4, FL, AT, PL, FSL, RLF, TUR, X-C, CL, AWCL, 360, HA,
USN ret. A & P mechanic |
|
|
|
Wingspan34 2 thumbs up


Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 5652 Location: Central NY
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:27 pm Post subject: |
#34 |
Ryan,
I read your last post (above) and thought "Good point." But then, I thought some more.
It doesn't really make sense to rotate the image - because the air was barely moving. It's upslope velocity was trivial.
There was hardly any air flow at all. Most of the air flow was generated by DD's efforts to accelerate the glider forward.
So, if it were possible to do so from the limited perspective of a single-point-of-view video, what you'd actually need to do is analyze DD's own forward "thrust vector" as it related to a mainly stationary air mass. Of course you may want to factor in the tiny effect that a 1 - 2 mph in/upward breeze would create.
So, in actuality, it was DD's own forward motion that created the greatest movement of air over his wing - not some nearly non-existent, parallel-to-the-slope-of-the-hill wind.
Yes, he might have been mushing the glider into the air, but not because it was nearly stalled (because of improper nose angle) but because he could barely run fast enough to create an adequate flow of air over the wing to produce ample lift to get himself and the glider into the air. He was playing the game of Russian Roulette which I previously mentioned.
Also -
Even with a stronger up hill breeze, the motion of the air EFFECTIVELY changes by some degree relative to the direction and speed of the combined pilot/wing's own direction of forward motion.
The closer the wind is to the glider's minimum air speed, the more important it is to have the wing properly set to the correct angle of attack - as pilot and glider proceed into that air flow. 1) Because the wing will create stronger forces more quickly as you begin moving forward, and 2) The direction of the glider/pilot combination never becomes fast enough to moderate any misalignment of AOA (since the forward speed needed to achieve lift off is so small).
Things to realize:
- When the wind is light or dead, the pilot's ability to adequately accelerate the glider to flying speed is the most critical issue - granting that s/he has a proper AOA relative to the pilot/wing's forward motion into the (calm) air.
- When the wind is in the 15 - 18 mph range (or above), the pilot's ability to properly set the AOA is the most critical issue - granting that s/he will not have any difficulty moving the glider forward into the existing air flow and accelerating it up to flying speed.
- When the wind is above 18 mph, AOA between the wing and relative oncoming (uphill) airflow becomes super critical. Adequate forward acceleration of the pilot/wing (as initiated by the pilot) becomes relatively unimportant.
[One should note however, that in high wind conditions, once leaving the ground - and while negotiating a safe exit from the immediate terrain near launch (including any associated obstacles) - forward speed, relative to the ground, can be important.]
_________________ WW 141 Fusion SP
Master rated, First flight - May 1975
FL, PL, PA, AWCL, CL, FSL, RLF, TURB, X-C |
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:35 pm Post subject: |
#35 |
| Wingspan34 wrote: |
I read your last post (above) and thought "Good point." But then, I thought some more.
It doesn't really make sense to rotate the image - because the air was barely moving. It's upslope velocity was trivial.
There was hardly any air flow at all. Most of the air flow was generated by DD's efforts to accelerate the glider forward.
So, if it were possible to do so from the limited perspective of a single-point-of-view video, what you'd actually need to do is analyze DD's own forward "thrust vector" as it related to a mainly stationary air mass. |
I think your brain is interfering here
You are 100% correct in that the upslope velocity of the air was trivial. You are also 100% correct in that what needs to be analyzed is Day's movement through a mainly stationary air mass.
BUT HERE'S THE KICKER
Day is running down the slope of that hill, right? Attached to the glider...
The airflow the wing experiences is down and forward, exactly the slope of the hill (since day is running down the hill, and the glider isn't flying away without him, it must be moving down the hill as well)
_________________ Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG |
|
|
|
gluesniffer 3 thumbs up

Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 548
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:48 pm Post subject: |
#36 |
ryan - you say dreamer is pushing out on his last step, however his hands are still in the grapevine as he is leaving the ground as can be seen in the last frame of your post The grapevine pulls the nose down, not push it out. If he did push out and mush himself off the mountain, there is no alttitude loss afterward the "supposed pushout". He only has a smooth flight away from the mountain. If someone is pushing out it will result in a drop eventually, yet there isn't one here.
Dreamer- you suck- put your wing on craigslist and buy some rollerblades
|
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:56 pm Post subject: |
#37 |
If he's not pushing out, why are his arms extended, and his hang strap angled back behind his hang loop?
| gluesniffer wrote: |
| If he did push out and mush himself off the mountain, there is no alttitude loss afterward the "supposed pushout". |
If you're watching the glide path of the glider as he stops running, and you don't see a mush before the glide slope flattens out and he begins to fly away from the hill... then I can't help you any more...
You don't have to agree, but that's what I see...
_________________ Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG |
|
|
|
Wingspan34 2 thumbs up


Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 5652 Location: Central NY
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:06 pm Post subject: |
#38 |
| flyhigh013 wrote: |
| . . . The airflow the wing experiences is down and forward, . . . |
Slight correction. The airflow the wing experienced was UP(ward) and from the LE to Trailing edge (i.e., front to back, or moving backward) over the wing.
The motion the wing experienced was down and forward.
And, as I detailed in my post, the most critical aspect of a null wind launch is accelerating the wing to the point of minimal air speed. And AOA in this process requires an unusual balance. Hence the added danger.
I would add the following, considering your essentially correct reply:
The critical thing with a null wind launch is that lowering your nose angle to what may be considered to be a "perfect" AOA (for an ordinary, higher wind launch) will, in fact, tend to generate an excess forward thrust vector leading the glider to out accelerate the pilot BEFORE minimal air speed is achieved. This leading, of course, to a nasty down hill WHACK.
To do a null wind launch expertly - or, at least, well - you must maintain an AOA which does not generate typical (or significant) forward forces - because doing so will lead the wing to exceed your human ability to keep up with it.
The best course in a null wind situation is to adjust the AOA so that the forces generated by the wing pull only (or almost so) upwards. (This may NOT be the situation you normally want your glider to be in during the "average" positive up slope airflow launch.)
Meanwhile, the pilot and gravity can take care of accelerating the glider forward to the point at which the positive airflow over the wing produces adequate lift to allow the pilot/wing to become airborne. The glider is likely to be in mush mode or near it (particularly an intermediate or advanced wing!), but the alternative (holding a more typical AOA at the beginning of the launch run) is, I repeat, for the glider to over speed the pilot, and consequently end up nosing in violently.
What I'm saying may seem to contradict my earlier statement (in my previous post) about flying slow close to the ground. However, I still emphasize that ZERO wind launches ARE more dangerous. That's why, as a pilot who began flying nearly 35 years ago, I seriously avoid them.
For any students, or prospective students, reading this -
Training gliders are designed to fly and stall at slower speeds. They are often much lighter than intermediate and advanced wings and the pilot's personal equipment (usually a very minimal harness and helmet for students) is up to 15 pounds lighter than that of an experienced pilot. For these reasons instructors very often can and do teach in calm, or near calm, wind conditions.
_________________ WW 141 Fusion SP
Master rated, First flight - May 1975
FL, PL, PA, AWCL, CL, FSL, RLF, TURB, X-C |
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:45 pm Post subject: |
#39 |
| Wingspan34 wrote: |
| The critical thing with a null wind launch is that lowering your nose angle to what may be considered to be a "perfect" AOA (for an ordinary, higher wind launch) will, in fact, tend to generate an excess forward thrust vector leading the glider to out accelerate the pilot BEFORE minimal air speed is achieved. This leading, of course, to a nasty down hill WHACK. |
As someone who often launches (a 70 lb topless) in no wind conditions at 8,000+ ft msl, I disagree with the above statement.
In those types of conditions, getting off the hill as cleanly and efficiently as possible is key...
_________________ Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG |
|
|
|
Wingspan34 2 thumbs up


Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 5652 Location: Central NY
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:05 pm Post subject: |
#40 |
| flyhigh013 wrote: |
| Wingspan34 wrote: |
| The critical thing with a null wind launch is that lowering your nose angle to what may be considered to be a "perfect" AOA (for an ordinary, higher wind launch) will, in fact, tend to generate an excess forward thrust vector leading the glider to out accelerate the pilot BEFORE minimal air speed is achieved. This leading, of course, to a nasty down hill WHACK. |
As someone who often launches (a 70 lb topless) in no wind conditions at 8,000+ ft msl, I disagree with the above statement.
In those types of conditions, getting off the hill as cleanly and efficiently as possible is key... |
. . . and you can't do that if your AOA generates . . . an excess forward thrust vector leading the glider to out accelerate [you] BEFORE minimal air speed is achieved.
Ryan, we'll need a video of you doing just such a no winder so that we can compare your nose angle to that of DD's. It should be taken at a launch site with the same slope and from a similar perspective as in DD's.
BTW - I suspect we would both choose a nearly identical AOA with which to launch each of our own gliders - if we found ourselves at the same (no wind) launch site at the same time. I believe our differences are in theoretical perspective only.
_________________ WW 141 Fusion SP
Master rated, First flight - May 1975
FL, PL, PA, AWCL, CL, FSL, RLF, TURB, X-C |
|
|
|
|