| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
AP 3 thumbs up


Joined: 07 Jul 2007 Posts: 1347 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:54 pm Post subject: High Energy Parachutes |
#1 |
I spoke to Bette from High Energy yesterday. What a nice person, and how lucky are we to have someone whose intellect, passion and drive to design and build excellent rescue equipment is involved with our sport of HG.
When I first looked into updating my parachute 18 months ago I scrutinised many different types and it became clear only two manufacturers had a product I would be happy to trust my life in. Of the two manufacturers High Energy had a number of advantages including descent rate after inflation, but more importantly the quality of construction was the superior.
At that time I still did not appreciate just how good High Energy parachutes were. The R&D invested by High Energy has been extensive and at times drew criticism from others who claimed their philosophy was too extreme and uncompromising. I am so thankful they did not compromise!
http://www.highenergysports.com/hg_eparachutes.htm _________________ A ship in harbour is safe. |
|
|
|
HangDiver 3 thumbs up


Joined: 06 Nov 2007 Posts: 2074 Location: Salida, Villa Grove, Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:05 pm Post subject: |
#2 |
| Nicely stated, and again it's nice that you're here to write about it. I purchased the HE 440. |
|
|
|
jjcote 3 thumbs up


Joined: 01 Dec 2007 Posts: 3216 Location: Lunenburg, MA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:07 pm Post subject: |
#3 |
At Thanksgiving dinner last week, we went around the table and each person had to say what he or she was thankful for. After scrutinizing other people's comments, when my turn came I determined that it was not inappropriate to say, "I'm thankful that my parachute worked". After laughter from those gathered, my girlfriend was next, and she said, "I'm thankful that his parachute worked".
I'm now one of the very few people around using a fully tested parachute (after having had it inspected and given a thumbs-up from Betty). _________________ H4 + various skills (only foot-launch so far)
WW UltraSport 147, WW Falcon2 170, PacAir Vision Mark IV 17
My HG wiki profile and my flying blog |
|
|
|
Spark 3 thumbs up


Joined: 26 Jul 2006 Posts: 1875 Location: Evergreen, Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:31 pm Post subject: |
#4 |
Amen to that.
Betty's sure got a high quality product and a superior design (thanks to Bill G)
I've got the HES QS440 for my HG and another for my PG.
Now that winter is here. it will soon be time for some practice deployments, harness and reserve inspections, repacking. _________________ 'Spark
H4/OBS - WW U2-160 & Falcon 2 195
P3, Skywalk Chili L |
|
|
|
DocSoc 3 thumbs up


Joined: 14 May 2007 Posts: 1881 Location: Miami Beach
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:41 pm Post subject: |
#5 |
Through the years I've see many of Betty's products and I have to say that she makes a great product and stands behind everything. Not to mention her knowledge in how to pack a chute! LOL...
I love her and her stuff...
-DocSoc _________________ Socrates
Rogallo Member USHPA
"Team Chicken Hawk" |
|
|
|
skypilot155 3 thumbs up


Joined: 29 Sep 2008 Posts: 515 Location: Grass Valley, California
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:46 pm Post subject: |
#6 |
After reading these postings I'm even happier that I have an HES Quantum330' just had it repacked last month, here's hopeing I never need it  _________________ H-3 FL FSL ST
Sport2 155
Sport Pilot Antares 582 Trike
USAF 74/78 and USAFR 88/90 and proud to have served
Don't die until you're dead and in the mean time keep your eyes on Jesus |
|
|
|
NMERider 3 thumbs up


Joined: 07 Apr 2008 Posts: 7364
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 6:16 pm Post subject: |
#7 |
Honetly, the best part about owning a couple of Quantum 330s is taking them to Betty for a re-pack. I'm usually greeted with a hug before I get drilled on how I'm going to deal with deploying and descending onto live high tension wires or over water, etc. One of her favorites is how the heck I'm supposed to get upright in my backplate harness so I don't land face first. In this scenario there's no control bar and the glider is either gone or folded away from my reach. She has dozens of real life scenarios too.
Betty will be doing a clinic in the San Fernado Valley for the Sylmar club on January 16, 2010: http://shga.com/forum/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1764 Feel free to commit to join us if you are able to attend.
Maybe we can get Adam on live satellite feed?  |
|
|
|
Redbeard 3 thumbs up


Joined: 07 Jul 2007 Posts: 1291 Location: Santa Shoes, California
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 9:28 pm Post subject: |
#8 |
whoa, a doc soc sighting!!!
i am buying some new gear...HE chute is on the list.
i can hardly wait...!  _________________ "Never Land On Your Face"
H3
FL~FSL~CL~AWCL~AT
The Hangar--> Moyes Litesport 4~Vision Mark IV 17~UP Gemini
check out my pics... http://flickr.com/photos/26902164@N08/ |
|
|
|
DocSoc 3 thumbs up


Joined: 14 May 2007 Posts: 1881 Location: Miami Beach
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:08 am Post subject: |
#9 |
| Redbeard wrote: |
whoa, a doc soc sighting!!!
i am buying some new gear...HE chute is on the list.
i can hardly wait...!  |
Missed you too Redbeard!
-DocSoc _________________ Socrates
Rogallo Member USHPA
"Team Chicken Hawk" |
|
|
|
knumbknuts 3 thumbs up


Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Posts: 5004 Location: Carlsbad, CA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:26 am Post subject: |
#10 |
Doc Soc is back on the org!
 |
|
|
|
mikewrx 3 thumbs up


Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 181 Location: CT
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:24 am Post subject: |
#11 |
AP, I'm glad you're still with us.
As a new pilot about to purchase my first parachute I've reviewed the available data regarding descent rate on the HE website. The same website describes the rigorous nature of their testing. Obviously the extreme nature of AP's incident suggests that the quality of the HE chutes is very high. However, what other data are available and what criteria should be in the evaluation when selecting a chute?
At this point I'm fairly certain that I'll be going with the HE option but I'd like to know if there is anything else I should be looking for as cost is not really a variable in the equation.
Mike |
|
|
|
red 3 thumbs up


Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 2732 Location: Utah, USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sol III
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:07 am Post subject: High Energy Parachutes |
#12 |
| mikewrx wrote: |
AP, I'm glad you're still with us.
As a new pilot about to purchase my first parachute I've reviewed the available data regarding descent rate on the HE website. The same website describes the rigorous nature of their testing. Obviously the extreme nature of AP's incident suggests that the quality of the HE chutes is very high. However, what other data are available and what criteria should be in the evaluation when selecting a chute?
At this point I'm fairly certain that I'll be going with the HE option but I'd like to know if there is anything else I should be looking for as cost is not really a variable in the equation.
Mike |
Mike,
I fly with a High Energy Quantum, with a para-swivel.
If you find anything better, please let me know.
 _________________ Cheers,
........Red.........................
Pssst! New pilot? Free advice, maybe worth the price,
http://www.xmission.com/~red/
H4, Moyes X2, Falcon Tandem, HES Tracer, Quantum |
|
|
|
soren_ladegaard 1 thumbs up

Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 573
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:15 am Post subject: Re: High Energy Parachutes |
#13 |
After 4 years and almost 600 post I am leaving this forum due to personal attacks. This forum has turned very hostile with 5-6 users harrassing others just for the sake of it. The forum lacks moderation so they noone's stopping them.
I am out of here! 
Last edited by soren_ladegaard on Fri Jun 18, 2010 1:47 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
Windlord 3 thumbs up


Joined: 20 Nov 2007 Posts: 4702 Location: Montana
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:26 am Post subject: Re: High Energy Parachutes |
#14 |
| soren_ladegaard wrote: |
| AP wrote: |
| ...it became clear only two manufacturers had a product I would be happy to trust my life in. Of the two manufacturers High Energy...... |
Which one is the other manufacturer?
I myself fly with a Metamorforsi Conar. |
Metamorforsi would have been my guess. _________________ H-4 (1976) UP Saturn 147 & UP Axis 13
The Cloudbase Foundation
Learn to fly hang gliders (click here}
Torrey Hawks #208 |
|
|
|
Mayeric
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 Posts: 26 Location: France
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:49 pm Post subject: |
#15 |
FYI, for having tried to buy a metamorfosis chute this year, I got a response that the company closed late last year :-(
Mayeric |
|
|
|
AP 3 thumbs up


Joined: 07 Jul 2007 Posts: 1347 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:37 am Post subject: |
#16 |
Metamorphosi was the other chute manufacturer. Angelo Crapenzano passed away sometime ago and I thought his wife was continuing on with the business. Angelo was an authority on parachute design and development. His parachutes were my 2nd choice after High Energy.
I spoke for a long time with Betty the other day. She was really interested to know everything about the accident in Gulgong and it was clear her passion is a big part of High Energy's success. _________________ A ship in harbour is safe. |
|
|
|
enormydude 3 thumbs up


Joined: 03 May 2008 Posts: 221 Location: NSW, Australia.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:42 am Post subject: |
#17 |
Red, I also had Betty put a para-swivel on my new one. Is there any info on what they can withstand in terms of shock load from a possible freefall deployment?
I asked for it because of concerns that if the wing/harness is still rotating on the slow descent from a high deploy then the chute could end up twisting the risers together and shutting it down.
Norm. _________________ Mars 170, Sting3 168, HES Tracer & Explorer LD, Quantum 330 reserves |
|
|
|
steve prater 3 thumbs up


Joined: 05 Sep 2008 Posts: 367 Location: L.A. ( lower arkansas usa)
|
|
|
|
red 3 thumbs up


Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 2732 Location: Utah, USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sol III
|
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:48 am Post subject: High Energy Parachutes |
#19 |
| enormydude wrote: |
Red, I also had Betty put a para-swivel on my new one. Is there any info on what they can withstand in terms of shock load from a possible freefall deployment?
I asked for it because of concerns that if the wing/harness is still rotating on the slow descent from a high deploy then the chute could end up twisting the risers together and shutting it down.
Norm. |
Norm,
The short answer from me is "I don't know."
If testing was ever done, I have not seen the results.
Having seen each part (inside) of the one that Betty uses,
I think it is safe to say the pilot's body would fail, long before that beefy unit will.
The risers being twisted together by a spinning glider is a valid concern, after a good deployment.
I have seen it happen, in two separate incidents, without para-swivels installed.
Both pilots were lucky, and walked away, because they had very low deployments,
and the 'chutes had not become streamers yet, when they hit.
The para-swivel is the sure and direct remedy for that concern.
 _________________ Cheers,
........Red.........................
Pssst! New pilot? Free advice, maybe worth the price,
http://www.xmission.com/~red/
H4, Moyes X2, Falcon Tandem, HES Tracer, Quantum |
|
|
|
Spark 3 thumbs up


Joined: 26 Jul 2006 Posts: 1875 Location: Evergreen, Colorado
|
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:16 pm Post subject: |
#20 |
Not to be off-topic.
I've come down under canopy twice without a paraswivel, first one fairly low., second one high.
The bridle twisted and the risers twisted and the reserve got smaller and began to spill air and slip.
I hit hard.
I needed a paraswivel. _________________ 'Spark
H4/OBS - WW U2-160 & Falcon 2 195
P3, Skywalk Chili L |
|
|
|
|