Tumble in supine? - Hang Gliding Org - Worlds largest Hang Gliding community, discover Hang Gliding

Search

  • Sorry...You must register to activate searching









Post new topic   Reply to topic    Hang Gliding Org Forum Index -> Hang gliding general->Tumble in supine?
BURY this topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Suneagle
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 29 Feb 2012
Posts: 185
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 11:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #21   
Thanks for the thought Ian. I guess a better way for me to imagine it is to go the extreme in a more real way. Rather than 100 feet below, what if the glider was remote control and the weight shift was a weight inside the wing that moves forward or backward along the keel.

What is the air doing to make a glider tumble? (Plenty of other posts on this subject here and elsewhere that I've seen).

So... a big model, don't worry about roll, imagine setting up a big wind tunnel that can produce wind shear sufficient to pitch a glider over to a tumble, then test it.

I'd love to see someone in the know do some graphics showing force vectors on a HG wing in flight with variations for the pitching moment based on the distance of the pilot from the hang point.

Perhaps there is NO difference?? Normally I can figure these things out logically but this query of mine is genuine and the answer still evades me. A poll is just a bunch of equally ignorant people taking a guess.

I'd like to hear from any pilot who has a great knowledge of theory who can prove mathematically or diagrammatically what the real answer is.

IT'S A CHALLENGE TO ALL THE EXPERTS ON THIS FORUM... Twisted Evil

Does hanging lower make the glider less prone to tumble, more prone, or no difference?

_________________
Member of the old farts brigade: Simply sublime supine and peace of mind.
1980 - Present: McDonald Eagle 5,Moyes:- Mega 2, Meteor, GT, GTR, Xtralite, Lightspeed, Malibu.
Extassy, Airwave Magic III, Vision 5
Airborne:- trikes x 2, C4. Currently flying a REV.
Plus a whole bunch of Paragliders 2008 - 2011
Member: Canungra Hang Gliding Club - Gold Coast, Australia.
Send private message  Rate this post
ian9toes
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 14 Sep 2008
Posts: 591
Location: Gold Coast

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #22   
How about thinking of it this way, which is perfect for you being bi-wingal. In a paraglider the pilot is susspended way lower than in a hang glider. What are more known for tumbles paragliders or hang gliders?
_________________
C4 13, KTM 300 2-stroke.
Send private message  Rate this post
Suneagle
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 29 Feb 2012
Posts: 185
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #23   
Ian, I think you are comparing apples with oranges.
Paragliders have a frontal collapses.
Hang gliders go 'over the falls'.
Although similar air may cause both, there is little else to compare.

_________________
Member of the old farts brigade: Simply sublime supine and peace of mind.
1980 - Present: McDonald Eagle 5,Moyes:- Mega 2, Meteor, GT, GTR, Xtralite, Lightspeed, Malibu.
Extassy, Airwave Magic III, Vision 5
Airborne:- trikes x 2, C4. Currently flying a REV.
Plus a whole bunch of Paragliders 2008 - 2011
Member: Canungra Hang Gliding Club - Gold Coast, Australia.
Send private message  Rate this post
bobknop
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Posts: 66
Location: Holland

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #24   
Hi Jerry,
The proof is in eating the pudding.
Four weeks ago i crashed my supine ( legs under bar) perfex while step towing.
Remember i made a remark on your spreaderbar?Read on.
I am preparing an article in our Deltamagazine,but think what happed gives a idea on tumbles,
and supine safety in general.
As you know i fly this way; http://youtu.be/-PANAxzQdkY
I was flying back away from the cable,and making a turn towards the cable at 119 meters AGL.
After the turn the cable pushed against my left cable and then my wheel.
I went into a left bank and nosed way up.When flying planes they taught me to ;Freeze the problem,
and fly the plain…I never had a chance to pull my reserve,which is on my back,to be grabbed with
left or right hand,but since the unusual attitude i quickly released the cable and did not want to loose
hold of the BB, scared to get disoriented.
We have week links they work fine if you have the right grade and enough speed, while flying away
from the winch.In my opinion a week link does not protect against lockout.
I do not know if the tips where still flying,but i instinctly pulled all the way in;,which is easy because
your legs are like a counter weight in front of you. I think protection against a tumble is simply: copy
a dart ,or :make sure all your weight is far forward and stay there! even when past vertical.(Relative wind)
I then tried to get a level attitude after doing that.
The glider will let you know when it is most efficient to pull out of the dive,by pressure.
Remember ,close to terrain,when your speed doubles,the space required is four times as much.
So, when doing 25 kmpu and you need , say 15 meters,you need 60 meters when doing 50kmpu.
To pull up. Young pilots cut off chimneys of girlfriends houses that way…..
My wing might break when over 60kmpu when diving,in turbulance.Below that speed
it should stall first ,a wing can stall at any speed.
I crashed in a two metre high cornfield,not a bad place.The wing was totalled five failures in the
mainframe and all battens crushe ,many holes in the sail .The sail was ripped from nose to tail.
Also the hook connecting the crossbar to the keel was straightened out.The wing took it all.
I cant prove if crashing supine is safer,all i can prove is the height i was at when it started,i
have no film of the crash,unfortunately.
The spreaderbar is made of the same stuff as a bottembar ( you have one ) and broke in two when crashing.
It must have absorbed lots of energy,no marks or dirt on it.I think it should at least hold to 4.5 G force.
I did not have one scratch or bruise! All i had was a sore spot on my ribcage,where the radio is situated.
The next few days i was very stiff,i must say.High energy traumas can harm you badly from a height of
2-3 times body length.You can break your neck flying prone,or break your vertebrae flying supine.
Yes,i ride a flevobike racer recumbent bicyckle, legs up front too, ,lots of wind in Holland.
So no signific proof,fair dinkum mate!Lost all my aussy slang,used to work in Hallscreek,great sandy dessert.
Coincidece,should get my funfex next week,ordered it tweo months ago.
Why get a slick wing?,All you get is a litle more penatration,we fly slow,remember if you are draggy,increasing speed makes drag quadruple (Disregard all spelling mistakes,highschool only)

http://youtu.be/-PANAxzQdkY
http://youtu.be/Ktpg0dkV44Q

Regards (sitting) Bob Knop.
Send private message  Rate this post
Suneagle
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 29 Feb 2012
Posts: 185
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 4:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #25   
Thanks for the accident report Bob.
Very glad to hear that you are ok. Sorry to hear that you wrote your glider off.

I've a few questions:
1/ Did you have a big stall when you released? Then dive and recover only you hit the ground before your wing would pull up?
2/ Your wing is single surface? Not easy to tumble.
3/ How did you impact? Nose, base bar, legs?

In regards to flying slow and lots of drag in supine at speed I'd have to agree, especially on a single surface wing.

On the other hand, with my harness and flying a Rev I can comfortably reach 90 kph which is the limit set by the bar reaching harness when I pull in fully. My glide is still good and I don't thinking I'm sacrificing much overall performance.

Paragliders could fly rings around my Malibu on an XC, but the Rev leaves them for dead, as it should.

_________________
Member of the old farts brigade: Simply sublime supine and peace of mind.
1980 - Present: McDonald Eagle 5,Moyes:- Mega 2, Meteor, GT, GTR, Xtralite, Lightspeed, Malibu.
Extassy, Airwave Magic III, Vision 5
Airborne:- trikes x 2, C4. Currently flying a REV.
Plus a whole bunch of Paragliders 2008 - 2011
Member: Canungra Hang Gliding Club - Gold Coast, Australia.
Send private message  Rate this post
AIRTHUG
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007
Posts: 6159
Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #26   
Suneagle wrote:

Does hanging lower make the glider less prone to tumble, more prone, or no difference?


I guess I should add that my post earlier is FACT, not opinion... You can look it up if you like, or take my word for it, but this is not speculation- it's an actual aerodynamic principle.

AIRTHUG wrote:
in terms of pitch stability: Having your CG closer to the wing will make you less likely to tumble. The problem isn't having the nose pitched down at the ground, it's if the glider's stability systems can't dampen the MOMENTUM of that rotation.

The lower your CG is from the wing, the more rotational momentum you will have when the wing goes from level to nose-down, and the more likely it will be to go PAST nose down and initiate a tumble.


Paragliders are a good example. More roll-stable, but WAY less pitch stable.

Also, the comments above about pulling in making the glider more pitch stable are also correct, but that's horizontal CG location, not vertical... so two different things...

_________________
Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG
Send private message  Rate this post
bobknop
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Posts: 66
Location: Holland

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 6:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #27   
Hi Jerry,
It went so fast,i have to relay on people on the ground to tell if i really stalled,but i did go vertical. No tumble
My basebar hit the crops, not enough space,otherwise i would have been able to put it down in a more gracious way.
Its a finsterwalder perfex SS ,supine config off factory,15.9 m2
For reflex it relies on lufflines or reflex bridles,very safe,and i think that saved my life.
I can not determine exactly where my body first contacted the ground,but i had a sore rib,and nothing else
Cant remember that my feet touched the ground first. I regret not having any video on this.
Regards Bob
Send private message  Rate this post
bobknop
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Posts: 66
Location: Holland

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #28   
KrunoDr wrote:
Please keep us posted on type of harness you get and how does it react when towing.
I have spend hours researching what kind of para harness would be the best for this without success, I specially don't like how they look with airbags and outside containers for parachute,and leg buckles.

If any members that fly para glider and hang gliders have any thoughts which harness would be the best please share your thoughts,or have one for sale let me know.

I think older style para glider harness would work nice.



Kruno,
I use a kortelkruyer leightweight harnas,weighs nothing and you can adjust
it so you can strech out all the way,and reduce your frontal surface and cw
see halfway the video.


http://youtu.be/-PANAxzQdkY

Regards Bob.
Send private message  Rate this post
KrunoDr



Joined: 02 May 2010
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #29   
Yes I saw that harness, I thought you got it at Charly-F.
When I looked at the website I could not find it, and when I order a spreader bar from them I got advice to get a paraglider harness because beginer one they have listed is not comfy after prolong flights.


I think it would be great for dunes.Ill try to find it.
How comftorable is it after longer flights?
Send private message  Rate this post
bobknop
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Posts: 66
Location: Holland

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #30   
KrunoDr wrote:
Yes I saw that harness, I thought you got it at Charly-F.
When I looked at the website I could not find it, and when I order a spreader bar from them I got advice to get a paraglider harness because beginer one they have listed is not comfy after prolong flights.


I think it would be great for dunes.Ill try to find it.
How comftorable is it after longer flights?


You can download their cataloque from the net (issue)
its in there.Dont confuse their own supine harnas with what i have.(kortel)
I fly four hour plus flights with it, very comfortable.
But ,everyone is different,
Regards Bob.
Send private message  Rate this post
Suneagle
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 29 Feb 2012
Posts: 185
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #31   
Thanks Ryan. Logically makes sense. The factors that I'm interested in might be outside the parameters of theory. To be specific:
1/ Is a tumble most on the cards when we "go over the falls?"
2/ If so, then going over the falls is when we go momentarily weightless. So either our weightlessness (slack hang strap) has no effect or the complete opposite, the slack hang strap leaves the glider to it's own devices and hence the tumble.
3/ Ryan, you do loops, so you know the importance of keeping positive G's on the wing (hang strap) all the way through. Could it be that the lack of hang strap pressure on a nose down glider will contribute to the tumble?
4/ Or it is simply all about momentum, the glider pitching about the pilot which in turn requires the pilot to be exerting a force through the hang strap?

I hope that my questions are illuminating the point I'm curious about. Tumbling and what causes it? What prevents it? We know that washout/sprog settings are vital... (I'd guess 9/10) so, how important (from 1 to 10) is our height below the wing in preventing it?

One final question (I'm sure many pilots are interested in tumble prevention, so I'll risk being a nuisance). A glider is much less likely to tumble if it is banked up. Right? If a thermal is strong and rough I personally prefer to be cranked over to work it. Am I doing the right thing here? Ooops that was 2 questions Cool

Thanks to Ryan and everyone else in advance for taking the time to answer. I'm here to learn (and stay safe).

......................

Bob, sounds like you almost pulled up in time. Perhaps the very same 2m crop field that cushioned your impact was also the cause of your impact? If I had to crash, I think a lush crop would be choice number one!

I noticed in your towing video that the tow strap hit your wheel as you turned to do each step, so it seems to be a predicable event. How was it different this time to cause you to release? I still think step towing is very risky and you need a very good controller on the winch, not to mention good piloting skills to make it work. Perhaps you can convince your club to invest in a Dragonfly and aerotow instead?

_________________
Member of the old farts brigade: Simply sublime supine and peace of mind.
1980 - Present: McDonald Eagle 5,Moyes:- Mega 2, Meteor, GT, GTR, Xtralite, Lightspeed, Malibu.
Extassy, Airwave Magic III, Vision 5
Airborne:- trikes x 2, C4. Currently flying a REV.
Plus a whole bunch of Paragliders 2008 - 2011
Member: Canungra Hang Gliding Club - Gold Coast, Australia.
Send private message  Rate this post
ian9toes
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 14 Sep 2008
Posts: 591
Location: Gold Coast

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #32   
AIRTHUG wrote:

I guess I should add that my post earlier is FACT, not opinion... You can look it up if you like, or take my word for it, but this is not speculation- it's an actual aerodynamic principle.



Do you have a link?

_________________
C4 13, KTM 300 2-stroke.
Send private message  Rate this post
dave hopkins
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 25 Dec 2010
Posts: 719

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #33   
on toes wrote:
G'day Jerry. Concerning the likelihood of a tumble in supine, my gut feeling is that you would be less likely to tumble. The way that I often imagine things in my head is to go to extreme, and then see what my instincts tell me. For example in your situation lets try and imagine you're in a harness that hangs 100 feet lower than your glider, now my gut reaction is that it is going to be harder to tumble. So if 100 foot lower is more stable than surely 1 foot lower is also more stable, it's very hard to imagine being a little bit lower would make you less stable and then suddenly at some point you go back the other way to being more stable again.

Another thought experiment is to imagine a milo tin half full of milo (works for coffee too Smile ) Now you know that tin won't roll very easily, but if the milo tin was completely full so that the centre of gravity was in the centre it would roll much easier, this to me seems analogous to being high above your base bar with your centre of gravity being as close to the centre as possible, making rotation much more easier.

So basically my instincts tell me you'll be safer, although they could be wrong.


Most tumbles are caused by the fact that hang gliders have a low center of mass. During over the falls and in strong turbulence the wing can fly (rotate) around the center of mass( the pilot) which is 4 ft below the center of lift.

Instincts and aerodynamics don't go together .Unless we learn the correct response for the aerodynamic situation and put it into practice like it was an instinct. Such as pulling in in a stall and hold it until we get bar pressure back.

The pilot being a foot lower will lower the center of mass further separating it from the center of lift. This will make it easier for the wing to rotate around the pilot making it more likely to tumble. 100 ft lower would be very different. Then the wing would have to dive a 100 ft to get around the pilot making it liklely to recover . See what I mean?

Dave[/i]
Send private message  Rate this post
AIRTHUG
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007
Posts: 6159
Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #34   
Suneagle wrote:

1/ Is a tumble most on the cards when we "go over the falls?"

I would say that getting pitched down, "over the falls" is a tumble that got prevented. The wing is not really flying, it's more just falling out or even getting spit out of a thermal, resulting in a nose-down orientation. The sweep and reflex of the wing is designed to dampen the pitch down rotation. Without damnpening, it would be much easier for the glider to rotate past nose-down, and the pilot would then fall into the sail. A lower CG will at first resist the pitch down rotation (the glider will be slower to start rotating)... but there will be more rotational inertia that the sweep and reflex needs to dampen in order to prevent a tumble. Hanging higher will mean less pitch-down rotational iniertia, and less likely to continue past center and into a tumble.

Suneagle wrote:

2/ If so, then going over the falls is when we go momentarily weightless. So either our weightlessness (slack hang strap) has no effect or the complete opposite, the slack hang strap leaves the glider to it's own devices and hence the tumble.

Technically, going over the falls the glider rotates around the center of gravity, which is somewhere between pilot and wing. Since pilot is 200+ lbs and wing is 80 or less lbs, it's pretty close to the pilot. What actually happens is the glider jumps forward relative to the pilot. The feeling is, as the nose dramatically rotates down, the bar actually pulls forward, away from the pilot. Don't think of it as a slack hang strap... unless the pilot fails to hold on to the base tube and maintain a CG-forward position.... if they don't do that, they find themselves in the back seat, and hopefully everyone knows that an aft-CG makes us MUCH more likely to tumble... or in this case, makes the glider much more likely to continue that pitch down rotation into a tuck/tumble. Staying glued to the base tube, hang strap tight or slack, will likely make it too difficult for the nose to continue past vertical and invert the wing.

Suneagle wrote:

3/ Ryan, you do loops, so you know the importance of keeping positive G's on the wing (hang strap) all the way through. Could it be that the lack of hang strap pressure on a nose down glider will contribute to the tumble?

See above- slack straps is not the cause of a tumble during a loop. Slack straps means the pitching rotation has stopped while inverted. Once inverted, if you have no positive G's, you have no weight shift control. Even if you have lots of speed, you can't just pitch out a little to use your energy to increase the pitching motion and finish the maneuver.... once's you're weightless.... you can either hold on to the base tube, or fall into the wing. Holding on gives you much higher chances of recovery. Usually falling into the wing breaks the glider, causing a tumble by default. So, in the example of slack hang straps while looping, the problem is stopping upside down, not the slack straps themselves.

Suneagle wrote:
4/ Or it is simply all about momentum, the glider pitching about the pilot which in turn requires the pilot to be exerting a force through the hang strap?


Think of the wing + pilot as one unit.

Suneagle wrote:

I hope that my questions are illuminating the point I'm curious about. Tumbling and what causes it? What prevents it? We know that washout/sprog settings are vital... (I'd guess 9/10) so, how important (from 1 to 10) is our height below the wing in preventing it?


I'm not sure I'm qualified to rate how important each thing is... but I would say sweep, reflex, and center of gravity (primarily fore/aft) all work together to dampen the pitch down rotation enough that it doesn't turn into a tumble. A really swept wing with no reflex will still tumble... a barely swept wing with lots of reflex will still tumble... a really forward CG glider may or may not tumble.... if I had to say one is most important, it's actually pulling in and holding there. The distance of the CG below the wing just effects how much pitching inertia those systems will need to dampen.

Suneagle wrote:

One final question (I'm sure many pilots are interested in tumble prevention, so I'll risk being a nuisance). A glider is much less likely to tumble if it is banked up. Right? If a thermal is strong and rough I personally prefer to be cranked over to work it. Am I doing the right thing here? Ooops that was 2 questions Cool


Short answer, yes, I think so. First, in a bank your wingloading increases, so more control (including ability to pull in)... also stall speed and therefore airspeed are also up. Airspeed is required for the sweep and reflex of the wing to dampen a pitch over... a whip stall at 0 airspeed can tuck you right around, no matter how high your sprogs are set. Being banked also means if you get spit out at the ground, this isn't so much a pitch rotation as it is roll, yaw, and pitch. It's pretty hard to flip a hang gliding wingtip over wingtip... much MUCH easier to flip it keel over nose. Make sense?

ian9toes wrote:
AIRTHUG wrote:

I guess I should add that my post earlier is FACT, not opinion... You can look it up if you like, or take my word for it, but this is not speculation- it's an actual aerodynamic principle.



Do you have a link?


based on my words "you can look it up"... I might suggest this site www.google.com

Sorry- I couldn't help myself! I don't... I studied this a long time ago, before I even started flying solo. I was making styrofoam gliders and trying to get them to fly straighter off of launch. I was taping a washer right to the bottom of the wing, and I thought if I attached it to a piece of wire that hung below the wing it would help it fly straighter. If the wing rolled right, the washer would be well off to the left. If the nose popped up from a gust, the CG would be well-forward to get the nose down. It actually went into these wild pitch oscillations. That was when a local pilot and mentor of mine (and aerodynamic engineer) Harry Suds took me aside and taught me about CG distance below the wing and pitch stability.

making those little gliders actually taught me a lot of aerodynamic lessons... along with plenty of mentoring and teaching, obviously. But it's one thing to read it in a book (or now on a web site), and it something very different to take something, try that same thing in two different configurations, and literally SEE the effects...

It helped to not be old enough to worry about having a job or missing valuable airtime surrender

_________________
Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG
Send private message  Rate this post
seabird
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 05 Oct 2011
Posts: 10
Location: durban

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #35   
Hi Jerry, as a 4000hr PG pilot that now hang glides I am very interested in your harness solution. Did you choose to hang lower because of greater control or just to be able to have your cross bar in front of you instead of below you? Would it not be simpler to just hang above the bar and use the down tubes for control? Are there any disadvantages to this position? I would like to try a PG harness but I would prefer to hang in a position that the glider designer had expected me to be in.
Regards
Send private message  Rate this post
Suneagle
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 29 Feb 2012
Posts: 185
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 11:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #36   
Just back from another great fly today.

Ryan, thank you very much. Your answers make sense and are food for thought.
Now I'm thinking about going above my bar and seeing how that works.
Might try it first in my Malibu and if I'm feeling confident try in the Rev.

I've been told (by those who have tried) that flying a HG above the bar in suprone is very frightening in rough air.
I've been told that roll input is slow to respond, so turbulence is f**king awful.

I'm not sure that getting the boot of a PG race harness over the bar will be simple either, but I suspect it is doable.

The plus side would be hanging higher so landings would be easier.
Perhaps the other plus is less prone to tumble Confused and the full use of the bar so that the glider can be flown to top speed.

I know the (powered) doodlebug is above the bar, helped in part by the extra weight. Since I fly my wings at the top of the weight range I might be able to fly above the bar too.

Alternatively I could use my 'old' system to raise and lower myself in-flight; to pick which one is most suitable... definitely not KISS. crazy

The trick is to test things out without killing yourself along the way.Embarassed

Big thanks to everyone for contributing to this thread, especially Ryan.

_________________
Member of the old farts brigade: Simply sublime supine and peace of mind.
1980 - Present: McDonald Eagle 5,Moyes:- Mega 2, Meteor, GT, GTR, Xtralite, Lightspeed, Malibu.
Extassy, Airwave Magic III, Vision 5
Airborne:- trikes x 2, C4. Currently flying a REV.
Plus a whole bunch of Paragliders 2008 - 2011
Member: Canungra Hang Gliding Club - Gold Coast, Australia.
Send private message  Rate this post
ian9toes
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 14 Sep 2008
Posts: 591
Location: Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #37   
AIRTHUG wrote:


based on my words "you can look it up"... I might suggest this site www.google.com



The reason I asked for a link was I had already searched plenty and couldn't find anything to support what you were saying. I did however find this.

"An alternative approach is to locate the main weight of the aircraft a significant distance below the wing center, so that gravity will tend to maintain the aircraft in a horizontal attitude and so counteract any aerodynamic instability. In practice this is not sufficient to provide stability on its own, and typically is augmented by sweepback and washout as described. A classic example is the Rogallo wing hang glider."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tailless_aircraft

With that washer that you had attached to your styrofoam glider, You stated;

"It actually went into these wild pitch oscillations"

I could definitely see that the washer would have more leverage over the wing the further it was away, but an ocscillation is not a tumble.

_________________
C4 13, KTM 300 2-stroke.
Send private message  Rate this post
bobknop
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Posts: 66
Location: Holland

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #38   
ian9toes wrote:
AIRTHUG wrote:


based on my words "you can look it up"... I might suggest this site www.google.com



The reason I asked for a link was I had already searched plenty and couldn't find anything to support what you were saying. I did however find this.

"An alternative approach is to locate the main weight of the aircraft a significant distance below the wing center, so that gravity will tend to maintain the aircraft in a horizontal attitude and so counteract any aerodynamic instability. In practice this is not sufficient to provide stability on its own, and typically is augmented by sweepback and washout as described. A classic example is the Rogallo wing hang glider."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tailless_aircraft

With that washer that you had attached to your styrofoam glider, You stated;

"It actually went into these wild pitch oscillations"

I could definitely see that the washer would have more leverage over the wing the further it was away, but an ocscillation is not a tumble.




An aircraft only ,,feels,, G forces,it does not care about gravity at all!!
Straight and level means one G to a wing,not one gravity or something alike.
It also does not ,,feel,, what is up or down..

Regards Bob.
Send private message  Rate this post
AIRTHUG
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007
Posts: 6159
Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 6:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #39   
ian9toes wrote:

With that washer that you had attached to your styrofoam glider, You stated;

"It actually went into these wild pitch oscillations"

I could definitely see that the washer would have more leverage over the wing the further it was away, but an ocscillation is not a tumble.


If you do a mild stall and let go of the glider, it will do a few porpoising gyrations, each one lesser than the last... that means the glider is pitch STABLE. If you trim your glider too slow, and do the same exercise... each gyration will be more severe, because the wing is pitch UNSTABLE.

Stability means it wants to return to a steady state... and with the weight too far below the wing, it did not do this, each time it overshot equilibrium and it got worse and worse and worse. If it didn't hit the ground, it probably would have tumbled. The oscillation was coming from the weight getting to much momentum as the pitch changed, and that momentum carried the wing past center. If you go "over the falls" and your weight is lower, there will be more rotational momentum in the system and you're more likely to go past vertical.

_________________
Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG
Send private message  Rate this post
danmoser
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 May 2009
Posts: 276
Location: Sandy, Utah

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 12:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #40   
AIRTHUG wrote:


If you do a mild stall and let go of the glider, it will do a few porpoising gyrations, each one lesser than the last... that means the glider is pitch STABLE. If you trim your glider too slow, and do the same exercise... each gyration will be more severe, because the wing is pitch UNSTABLE.

Stability means it wants to return to a steady state... and with the weight too far below the wing, it did not do this, each time it overshot equilibrium and it got worse and worse and worse. If it didn't hit the ground, it probably would have tumbled. The oscillation was coming from the weight getting to much momentum as the pitch changed, and that momentum carried the wing past center. If you go "over the falls" and your weight is lower, there will be more rotational momentum in the system and you're more likely to go past vertical.



Ryan, your definition is actually for static stability -- the tendency to return to a steady state equilibrium.
Dynamic stability is a measure of how quickly it returns to steady state equilibrium.
This is where the concept of pitch damping comes in.
If it only takes one or two oscillation overshoots to "settle down" and fly smoothly, it has adequate pitch damping.
If if it oscillates many times with each oscillation only a little less in amplitude than the last, it is "under-damped"...

BTW the word is "damping" not "dampening" .. we're not talking about adding moisture to anything here.
.. except maybe the inside of your harness when you get tumbled. ROFL

One way to think about pitch damping is the shock absorbers on your car.
A car with springs alone still has "static stability" without shock absorbers.
It will tend to return it to a neutral position when displaced, but it is too lightly damped, and will continue to rock back & forth for a long time, like a pendulum.
Shock absorbers are designed to be close "critically damped".. which has a distinct mathematical definition for returning to equilibrium as quickly as possible.

You can't do much that would in effect "add shocks" to a lightly damped hang glider.
Beyond a certain point, extra washout from your bridle lines or sprogs won't help pitch damping either.
Tailless gliders with wider chords, that is, lower aspect ratios, have much better pitch damping.
Tailless narrow chord gliders with high aspect ratios have crappy pitch damping.
And to make it even more complex, pitch damping on tailless swept wings is not constant and varies greatly with angle of attack.
Experienced pilots will subconsciously compensate for equilibrium overshoot when flying narrow chord blade wings in moderately turbulent conditions.
But beware!!! Mother Nature can be a bi+ch.. and there are some super-nasty sharp edged thermals out there that can instantly throw anybody of any hang rating into an "a$$ over tea kettles" orientation .. with extra pucker factor. Shocked
Fly with some extra airspeed, don't lower your sprogs, and have your chute packed & ready!
Adding a little horizontal tail is an effective way to add pitch damping.. some manufacturers offer them... "purists" hate them for aesthetic reasons, but they work!..
And don't fly a high aspect ratio glider until you're VERY ready for it. thumbsup

_________________
Happy landings,
Dan Moser
Saturn 167, Predator 158, HES Cocoon, Bright Star SWIFT #37
Flying HGs (off & on) since 1975


Last edited by danmoser on Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:58 pm; edited 1 time in total
Send private message  Rate this post
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Hang Gliding Org Forum Index -> Hang gliding general
 
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3


 
Jump to:  


(c) HangGliding.org All rights reserved. Based on PhpBB