Falcon 4? - Hang Gliding Org - Worlds largest Hang Gliding community, discover Hang Gliding

Search

  • Sorry...You must register to activate searching









Post new topic   Reply to topic    Hang Gliding Org Forum Index -> Hang gliding general->Falcon 4?
BURY this topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Darbbb
2 thumbs up
2 thumbs up


Joined: 11 Feb 2009
Posts: 858
Location: Western Maryland

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:10 am    Post subject: Falcon 4? Reply with quote #1   
Unless I mis-read something, WW is demoing a Falcon 4 in Utah. Anyone know any particulars? How is it different from a Falcon 3?
_________________
H2
WW Eagle 180
Send private message  Rate this post
danmoser
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 May 2009
Posts: 276
Location: Sandy, Utah

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #2   
I just demoed the Falcon 4 195 this morning at the south side, in fact.
What a sweet, easy flying glider ... I thoroughly enjoyed it !! thumbsup
It instantly made me smile & giggle at how ridiculously EASY it was.
I immediately felt comfortable scratching next to the hill in weak ridge lift .. all while dodging a Saturday swarm of paras & hangies trying to do the same.

Compared to Falcon 3 195, Steve Pearson reported that it has a smaller diameter X-bar (52mm with 50mm inner sleeve) for lower drag, a greater batten density (more camber support near the root), and a couple other sail tweaks here & there.
Supposedly this allows it to fly 1-2mph slower.

They also had a 170 size Falcon 4 being flown there as part of the "demo days".
Steve said the 195 size has passed all structural tests.

Another new single surface glider prototype was out there as well.
I'll let the WW boys tell you more on that one .. popcorn

_________________
Happy landings,
Dan Moser
Saturn 167, Predator 158, HES Cocoon, Bright Star SWIFT #37
Flying HGs (off & on) since 1975
Send private message  Rate this post
knumbknuts
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 5004
Location: Carlsbad, CA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #3   
Interesting.

I've been thinking about getting a new Falcon. This almost cinches it.
Send private message Blog  Rate this post
ChattaroyMan
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 01 Nov 2009
Posts: 1803
Location: Chattaroy, WA -USA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #4   
Can't wait to hear more about all of this. It sounds like the Falcon 4 would be a great ship for light & variable days. It would also be quite interesting to see 2 SS designs offered by WW - if that's what the prototype is about????
_________________
U2 160 • Chattaroy, WA - USA
Send private message  Rate this post
Manta_Dreaming
1 thumbs up
1 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Jan 2012
Posts: 445

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #5   
ChattaroyMan wrote:
Can't wait to hear more about all of this. It sounds like the Falcon 4 would be a great ship for light & variable days. It would also be quite interesting to see 2 SS designs offered by WW - if that's what the prototype is about????
Yes, that's intriguing, unless it's a Carol Doda .
_________________
Mountains always have the right of way.

If you've never forgotten anything in your life, you don't need to do a hook-in check.

You're going to die anyway so you might as well fly.
Send private message  Rate this post
ChattaroyMan
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 01 Nov 2009
Posts: 1803
Location: Chattaroy, WA -USA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #6   
Manta_Dreaming wrote:
Yes, that's intriguing, unless it's a Carol Doda .


Meaning a topless SS???

_________________
U2 160 • Chattaroy, WA - USA
Send private message  Rate this post
Manta_Dreaming
1 thumbs up
1 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Jan 2012
Posts: 445

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #7   
ChattaroyMan wrote:
Manta_Dreaming wrote:
Yes, that's intriguing, unless it's a Carol Doda .


Meaning a topless SS???
Imagine the performance you'd see - and why not? Take the kingpost off, you lose some weight but add it back it with a stiffer sail. Seems like you could drop the weight down to a Falcon range.

Actually I've no idea what they're up to, but just dwelling on the rumors for the past several months.

More likely they're just going to tweak the product line already in place, and since the Condor is the only other SS in the current line up, well, I'd speculate it's a Condor tweak.

_________________
Mountains always have the right of way.

If you've never forgotten anything in your life, you don't need to do a hook-in check.

You're going to die anyway so you might as well fly.
Send private message  Rate this post
tom emery
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Posts: 639
Location: san diego

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 6:00 pm    Post subject: Wills Wing Reply with quote #8   
Was talking to the Wills Wing guys at AJX/Crestline a few weeks ago. They were demoing a prototype transitional glider easier to handle than the Falcon. I have a picture of it flying with a T2C.


Media BLOCKED

Please REGISTER
and log in to see this content
Send private message  Rate this post
Manta_Dreaming
1 thumbs up
1 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Jan 2012
Posts: 445

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 6:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #9   
A bunny glider?
_________________
Mountains always have the right of way.

If you've never forgotten anything in your life, you don't need to do a hook-in check.

You're going to die anyway so you might as well fly.
Send private message  Rate this post
knumbknuts
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 5004
Location: Carlsbad, CA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 6:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #10   
I wonder if it's basically a condor with luff lines, or close to a condor. It would kick ass to have a wing for normally pg-only days at Torrey.

They should call it the Albatross.
Send private message Blog  Rate this post
soaring
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Posts: 93
Location: Europe

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:49 pm    Post subject: Re: Wills Wing Reply with quote #11   
tom emery wrote:
Was talking to the Wills Wing guys at AJX/Crestline a few weeks ago. They were demoing a prototype transitional glider easier to handle than the Falcon. I have a picture of it flying with a T2C.

It looks a lot like the French Ellipse SolR:
http://www.ellipse-delta.com/index.php?id=2782&no_cache=1

The Ellipse SolR looks like a Condor with which you can do high altitude flights - not just ground skimming / training.

It'll be interesting to see what WW comes up with.

Here's a photo of the Ellipse SolR:



Media BLOCKED

Please REGISTER
and log in to see this content

_________________
Proficiency: Static line towing
Rating: Safepro 4
Country: Denmark
Glider: Crossover 15, Harness: SR, Helmet: Skyrunner, Vario: IQ Basic GPS
Send private message  Rate this post
Manta_Dreaming
1 thumbs up
1 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Jan 2012
Posts: 445

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #12   
The Ellipse has washout tubes while the WW in the photo doesn't appear to have them.

Well, it will be interesting to hear the release info.

_________________
Mountains always have the right of way.

If you've never forgotten anything in your life, you don't need to do a hook-in check.

You're going to die anyway so you might as well fly.
Send private message  Rate this post
ChattaroyMan
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 01 Nov 2009
Posts: 1803
Location: Chattaroy, WA -USA

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #13   
Stuck at home right now due to a sick driver so dreaming/speculating/wondering/etc. ...... looks like the 'prototype' is something between training and the Falcon 4 (remember - I'm speculating on limited info. in this thread). To take a much different train of thought - just on prototypes and designs, etc. - what about a topless Sport 2 or topless U2? Along the Sport 2-ish lines, what about a glider designed primarily for an excellent sink rate and handling and gets any speed it can purely from a low drag design - maybe a topless Sport 2??? - something that gets rid of the crossbar and kingpost, is relatively light, has a quick roll rate (lower tip area???) and with a good pilot could thermal a fart. ahh
_________________
U2 160 • Chattaroy, WA - USA
Send private message  Rate this post
davisstraub
1 thumbs up
1 thumbs up


Joined: 13 Dec 2010
Posts: 1713
Location: Boise, Idaho

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #14   
I've been flying what I think is the Wills Wing Falcon 4 demo since the Rob Kells meet. I really didn't know that it was any different than the 3 until it was pointed out that the tip wand was connected to the sail in a slightly different manner.

The handling is relatively poor compared to the T2C (my reference point). It's a lot more work to push out and thermal. I didn't see another location for putting back the hang point. Maybe I just missed that. The sail has some creases in it which I wish I could iron out. I assume that it wasn't folded correctly at some point before I got it.

I've been having a good time flying it and appreciate very much the use of it (I trade for Oz Report ad space). I have the aero control frame on it now and hope to break my world record for single surface set at 205 miles on a Falcon 3 170.

_________________
Davis Straub at the Oz Report
Send private message  Rate this post
Wonder Boy
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 1281
Location: Spokane WA

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #15   
ChattaroyMan wrote:
Stuck at home right now due to a sick driver so dreaming/speculating/wondering/etc. ...... looks like the 'prototype' is something between training and the Falcon 4 (remember - I'm speculating on limited info. in this thread). To take a much different train of thought - just on prototypes and designs, etc. - what about a topless Sport 2 or topless U2? Along the Sport 2-ish lines, what about a glider designed primarily for an excellent sink rate and handling and gets any speed it can purely from a low drag design - maybe a topless Sport 2??? - something that gets rid of the crossbar and kingpost, is relatively light, has a quick roll rate (lower tip area???) and with a good pilot could thermal a fart. ahh


Moyes Litesport.
Lighter handling, weight & easier handling then their flagship topless. Only giving up 1 point L/D and a bit of sink rate.

Mike

_________________
Everyone who lives dies, yet not everyone who dies, has lived.
We take these risks not to escape life, but to prevent life escaping us.



http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CenterOFLIFT/
Send private message  Rate this post
Paul H
2 thumbs up
2 thumbs up


Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 2184
Location: Reno, NV

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #16   
ChattaroyMan wrote:
Stuck at home right now due to a sick driver so dreaming/speculating/wondering/etc. ...... looks like the 'prototype' is something between training and the Falcon 4 (remember - I'm speculating on limited info. in this thread). To take a much different train of thought - just on prototypes and designs, etc. - what about a topless Sport 2 or topless U2? Along the Sport 2-ish lines, what about a glider designed primarily for an excellent sink rate and handling and gets any speed it can purely from a low drag design - maybe a topless Sport 2??? - something that gets rid of the crossbar and kingpost, is relatively light, has a quick roll rate (lower tip area???) and with a good pilot could thermal a fart. ahh


Get rid of the crossbar??? What would you replace it with?

_________________
Paul H
U2 160 USHPA # 51178 KE7VOG
H4, FL, AT, PL, FSL, RLF, TUR, X-C, CL, AWCL, 360, HA,
USN ret. A & P mechanic
Send private message  Rate this post
AIRTHUG
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007
Posts: 6159
Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #17   
I shouldn't say much...

but the goal of the prototype they're working on is EASIER TO FLY than a Falcon. Yes, you read that right. (and they've done it, too!)

But it's no condor.... the condor is training-specific, and this will be a very real hang glider. I actually think I might need one for myself, whenever they become available mosh

I'm super excited about this project... I think making hang gliding easier is just going to make it that much more FUN for new pilots. Getting back to the focus on how magical it is just to be able to launch, fly around, and land.... remember when that was all we ever wanted out of life?

Seeing all the advanced pilots demo-flying the Falcon 4 and giggling about how fun and easy it was is a real eye-opener..... as great as the newest performance wings are, sometimes I think we're losing more than we're gaining. If the end-goal is fun....

_________________
Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG
Send private message  Rate this post
Avnav8r
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Trenton, Georgia

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #18   
Hey,

In May, Paul Thornbury flew what WW was calling the Alpha at LMFP. He said it was around 215 square feet and flew fairly slow. He said that he was able to slow down enough to utilize lift that he would have bypassed in his Sport 2. Reminds me of the older floater days in the late 1970s when every manufacture had their on floater type of glider like the Moyes Maxi and Electra Flyer Floater. Maybe slower is better, at least that is what my wife tells me Embarassed

John Stokes

_________________
To err is human. To blame it on someone else, shows management potential.
Send private message  Rating: 2 thumbs up
psuguru
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 378
Location: The Darkest Hinterlands of Essex

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #19   
Paul H wrote:

Get rid of the crossbar??? What would you replace it with?

Bowsprit hang gliders don't have a crossbar.

_________________
"We should all have our heads examined"
"That's Rule Number 4"
CP Hill, CP Tow. Moyes Malibu 188.
Send private message  Rate this post
red
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 13 Aug 2007
Posts: 2745
Location: Utah, USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sol III

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 4:58 pm    Post subject: Falcon 4? Reply with quote #20   
Paul H wrote:
Get rid of the crossbar??? What would you replace it with?

Paul H,

Around 1979 or so, Tom Price (Albatross Sail Gliders) had the prototype ASG-23 flying, which had no kingpost, no top rigging, and no crossbars. The leading edges plugged into noseplate sockets, and streamlined wing struts (instead of sidewires) did the rest. The stainless steel "super-noseplate" was strong enough, but it was judged too expensive to produce. See pix below.
I want one . . . Cool

Mr. Green



Media BLOCKED

Please REGISTER
and log in to see this content

Media BLOCKED

Please REGISTER
and log in to see this content

_________________
Cheers,
........Red.........................
Pssst! New pilot? Free advice, maybe worth the price,
http://www.xmission.com/~red/
H4, Moyes X2, Falcon Tandem, HES Tracer, Quantum
Send private message  Rating: 3 thumbs up
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Hang Gliding Org Forum Index -> Hang gliding general
 
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 1 of 6


 
Jump to:  


(c) HangGliding.org All rights reserved. Based on PhpBB