| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
Darbbb 2 thumbs up


Joined: 11 Feb 2009 Posts: 858 Location: Western Maryland
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:10 am Post subject: Falcon 4? |
#1 |
Unless I mis-read something, WW is demoing a Falcon 4 in Utah. Anyone know any particulars? How is it different from a Falcon 3?
_________________ H2
WW Eagle 180 |
|
|
|
danmoser 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 276 Location: Sandy, Utah
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:30 am Post subject: |
#2 |
I just demoed the Falcon 4 195 this morning at the south side, in fact.
What a sweet, easy flying glider ... I thoroughly enjoyed it !!
It instantly made me smile & giggle at how ridiculously EASY it was.
I immediately felt comfortable scratching next to the hill in weak ridge lift .. all while dodging a Saturday swarm of paras & hangies trying to do the same.
Compared to Falcon 3 195, Steve Pearson reported that it has a smaller diameter X-bar (52mm with 50mm inner sleeve) for lower drag, a greater batten density (more camber support near the root), and a couple other sail tweaks here & there.
Supposedly this allows it to fly 1-2mph slower.
They also had a 170 size Falcon 4 being flown there as part of the "demo days".
Steve said the 195 size has passed all structural tests.
Another new single surface glider prototype was out there as well.
I'll let the WW boys tell you more on that one ..
_________________ Happy landings,
Dan Moser
Saturn 167, Predator 158, HES Cocoon, Bright Star SWIFT #37
Flying HGs (off & on) since 1975 |
|
|
|
knumbknuts 3 thumbs up


Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Posts: 5004 Location: Carlsbad, CA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 2:01 pm Post subject: |
#3 |
Interesting.
I've been thinking about getting a new Falcon. This almost cinches it.
|
|
|
|
ChattaroyMan 3 thumbs up


Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1803 Location: Chattaroy, WA -USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:49 pm Post subject: |
#4 |
Can't wait to hear more about all of this. It sounds like the Falcon 4 would be a great ship for light & variable days. It would also be quite interesting to see 2 SS designs offered by WW - if that's what the prototype is about????
_________________ U2 160 • Chattaroy, WA - USA |
|
|
|
Manta_Dreaming 1 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Jan 2012 Posts: 445
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:17 pm Post subject: |
#5 |
| ChattaroyMan wrote: |
| Can't wait to hear more about all of this. It sounds like the Falcon 4 would be a great ship for light & variable days. It would also be quite interesting to see 2 SS designs offered by WW - if that's what the prototype is about???? |
Yes, that's intriguing, unless it's a Carol Doda .
_________________ Mountains always have the right of way.
If you've never forgotten anything in your life, you don't need to do a hook-in check.
You're going to die anyway so you might as well fly. |
|
|
|
ChattaroyMan 3 thumbs up


Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1803 Location: Chattaroy, WA -USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:01 pm Post subject: |
#6 |
| Manta_Dreaming wrote: |
| Yes, that's intriguing, unless it's a Carol Doda . |
Meaning a topless SS???
_________________ U2 160 • Chattaroy, WA - USA |
|
|
|
Manta_Dreaming 1 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Jan 2012 Posts: 445
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:57 pm Post subject: |
#7 |
| ChattaroyMan wrote: |
| Manta_Dreaming wrote: |
| Yes, that's intriguing, unless it's a Carol Doda . |
Meaning a topless SS??? |
Imagine the performance you'd see - and why not? Take the kingpost off, you lose some weight but add it back it with a stiffer sail. Seems like you could drop the weight down to a Falcon range.
Actually I've no idea what they're up to, but just dwelling on the rumors for the past several months.
More likely they're just going to tweak the product line already in place, and since the Condor is the only other SS in the current line up, well, I'd speculate it's a Condor tweak.
_________________ Mountains always have the right of way.
If you've never forgotten anything in your life, you don't need to do a hook-in check.
You're going to die anyway so you might as well fly. |
|
|
|
tom emery 3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Sep 2011 Posts: 639 Location: san diego
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 6:00 pm Post subject: Wills Wing |
#8 |
Was talking to the Wills Wing guys at AJX/Crestline a few weeks ago. They were demoing a prototype transitional glider easier to handle than the Falcon. I have a picture of it flying with a T2C.
Media BLOCKED
Please REGISTER and log in to see this content
|
|
|
|
|
Manta_Dreaming 1 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Jan 2012 Posts: 445
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 6:20 pm Post subject: |
#9 |
A bunny glider?
_________________ Mountains always have the right of way.
If you've never forgotten anything in your life, you don't need to do a hook-in check.
You're going to die anyway so you might as well fly. |
|
|
|
knumbknuts 3 thumbs up


Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Posts: 5004 Location: Carlsbad, CA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 6:46 pm Post subject: |
#10 |
I wonder if it's basically a condor with luff lines, or close to a condor. It would kick ass to have a wing for normally pg-only days at Torrey.
They should call it the Albatross.
|
|
|
|
soaring 3 thumbs up


Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Posts: 93 Location: Europe
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:49 pm Post subject: Re: Wills Wing |
#11 |
| tom emery wrote: |
| Was talking to the Wills Wing guys at AJX/Crestline a few weeks ago. They were demoing a prototype transitional glider easier to handle than the Falcon. I have a picture of it flying with a T2C. |
It looks a lot like the French Ellipse SolR:
http://www.ellipse-delta.com/index.php?id=2782&no_cache=1
The Ellipse SolR looks like a Condor with which you can do high altitude flights - not just ground skimming / training.
It'll be interesting to see what WW comes up with.
Here's a photo of the Ellipse SolR:
Media BLOCKED
Please REGISTER and log in to see this content
|
_________________ Proficiency: Static line towing
Rating: Safepro 4
Country: Denmark
Glider: Crossover 15, Harness: SR, Helmet: Skyrunner, Vario: IQ Basic GPS |
|
|
|
Manta_Dreaming 1 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Jan 2012 Posts: 445
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:25 pm Post subject: |
#12 |
The Ellipse has washout tubes while the WW in the photo doesn't appear to have them.
Well, it will be interesting to hear the release info.
_________________ Mountains always have the right of way.
If you've never forgotten anything in your life, you don't need to do a hook-in check.
You're going to die anyway so you might as well fly. |
|
|
|
ChattaroyMan 3 thumbs up


Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1803 Location: Chattaroy, WA -USA
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:12 am Post subject: |
#13 |
Stuck at home right now due to a sick driver so dreaming/speculating/wondering/etc. ...... looks like the 'prototype' is something between training and the Falcon 4 (remember - I'm speculating on limited info. in this thread). To take a much different train of thought - just on prototypes and designs, etc. - what about a topless Sport 2 or topless U2? Along the Sport 2-ish lines, what about a glider designed primarily for an excellent sink rate and handling and gets any speed it can purely from a low drag design - maybe a topless Sport 2??? - something that gets rid of the crossbar and kingpost, is relatively light, has a quick roll rate (lower tip area???) and with a good pilot could thermal a fart.
_________________ U2 160 • Chattaroy, WA - USA |
|
|
|
davisstraub 1 thumbs up


Joined: 13 Dec 2010 Posts: 1713 Location: Boise, Idaho
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:27 am Post subject: |
#14 |
I've been flying what I think is the Wills Wing Falcon 4 demo since the Rob Kells meet. I really didn't know that it was any different than the 3 until it was pointed out that the tip wand was connected to the sail in a slightly different manner.
The handling is relatively poor compared to the T2C (my reference point). It's a lot more work to push out and thermal. I didn't see another location for putting back the hang point. Maybe I just missed that. The sail has some creases in it which I wish I could iron out. I assume that it wasn't folded correctly at some point before I got it.
I've been having a good time flying it and appreciate very much the use of it (I trade for Oz Report ad space). I have the aero control frame on it now and hope to break my world record for single surface set at 205 miles on a Falcon 3 170.
_________________ Davis Straub at the Oz Report |
|
|
|
Wonder Boy 3 thumbs up


Joined: 30 Jan 2008 Posts: 1281 Location: Spokane WA
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:06 am Post subject: |
#15 |
| ChattaroyMan wrote: |
Stuck at home right now due to a sick driver so dreaming/speculating/wondering/etc. ...... looks like the 'prototype' is something between training and the Falcon 4 (remember - I'm speculating on limited info. in this thread). To take a much different train of thought - just on prototypes and designs, etc. - what about a topless Sport 2 or topless U2? Along the Sport 2-ish lines, what about a glider designed primarily for an excellent sink rate and handling and gets any speed it can purely from a low drag design - maybe a topless Sport 2??? - something that gets rid of the crossbar and kingpost, is relatively light, has a quick roll rate (lower tip area???) and with a good pilot could thermal a fart.  |
Moyes Litesport.
Lighter handling, weight & easier handling then their flagship topless. Only giving up 1 point L/D and a bit of sink rate.
Mike
_________________ Everyone who lives dies, yet not everyone who dies, has lived.
We take these risks not to escape life, but to prevent life escaping us.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CenterOFLIFT/ |
|
|
|
Paul H 2 thumbs up


Joined: 13 May 2008 Posts: 2184 Location: Reno, NV
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:42 am Post subject: |
#16 |
| ChattaroyMan wrote: |
Stuck at home right now due to a sick driver so dreaming/speculating/wondering/etc. ...... looks like the 'prototype' is something between training and the Falcon 4 (remember - I'm speculating on limited info. in this thread). To take a much different train of thought - just on prototypes and designs, etc. - what about a topless Sport 2 or topless U2? Along the Sport 2-ish lines, what about a glider designed primarily for an excellent sink rate and handling and gets any speed it can purely from a low drag design - maybe a topless Sport 2??? - something that gets rid of the crossbar and kingpost, is relatively light, has a quick roll rate (lower tip area???) and with a good pilot could thermal a fart.  |
Get rid of the crossbar??? What would you replace it with?
_________________ Paul H
U2 160 USHPA # 51178 KE7VOG
H4, FL, AT, PL, FSL, RLF, TUR, X-C, CL, AWCL, 360, HA,
USN ret. A & P mechanic |
|
|
|
AIRTHUG 3 thumbs up


Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 6159 Location: Point of the Mountain, Draper, UT
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:30 pm Post subject: |
#17 |
I shouldn't say much...
but the goal of the prototype they're working on is EASIER TO FLY than a Falcon. Yes, you read that right. (and they've done it, too!)
But it's no condor.... the condor is training-specific, and this will be a very real hang glider. I actually think I might need one for myself, whenever they become available
I'm super excited about this project... I think making hang gliding easier is just going to make it that much more FUN for new pilots. Getting back to the focus on how magical it is just to be able to launch, fly around, and land.... remember when that was all we ever wanted out of life?
Seeing all the advanced pilots demo-flying the Falcon 4 and giggling about how fun and easy it was is a real eye-opener..... as great as the newest performance wings are, sometimes I think we're losing more than we're gaining. If the end-goal is fun....
_________________ Ryan Voight
BLOG: www.AIRTHUG.com
VIDEOS: http://vimeo.com/AIRTHUG |
|
|
|
Avnav8r 3 thumbs up


Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Posts: 994 Location: Trenton, Georgia
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:00 pm Post subject: |
#18 |
Hey,
In May, Paul Thornbury flew what WW was calling the Alpha at LMFP. He said it was around 215 square feet and flew fairly slow. He said that he was able to slow down enough to utilize lift that he would have bypassed in his Sport 2. Reminds me of the older floater days in the late 1970s when every manufacture had their on floater type of glider like the Moyes Maxi and Electra Flyer Floater. Maybe slower is better, at least that is what my wife tells me
John Stokes
_________________ To err is human. To blame it on someone else, shows management potential. |
|
|
|
psuguru 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Aug 2010 Posts: 378 Location: The Darkest Hinterlands of Essex
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:50 pm Post subject: |
#19 |
| Paul H wrote: |
Get rid of the crossbar??? What would you replace it with? |
Bowsprit hang gliders don't have a crossbar.
_________________ "We should all have our heads examined"
"That's Rule Number 4"
CP Hill, CP Tow. Moyes Malibu 188. |
|
|
|
red 3 thumbs up


Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 2745 Location: Utah, USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sol III
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 4:58 pm Post subject: Falcon 4? |
#20 |
| Paul H wrote: |
| Get rid of the crossbar??? What would you replace it with? |
Paul H,
Around 1979 or so, Tom Price (Albatross Sail Gliders) had the prototype ASG-23 flying, which had no kingpost, no top rigging, and no crossbars. The leading edges plugged into noseplate sockets, and streamlined wing struts (instead of sidewires) did the rest. The stainless steel "super-noseplate" was strong enough, but it was judged too expensive to produce. See pix below.
I want one . . .
Media BLOCKED
Please REGISTER and log in to see this content
|
Media BLOCKED
Please REGISTER and log in to see this content
|
_________________ Cheers,
........Red.........................
Pssst! New pilot? Free advice, maybe worth the price,
http://www.xmission.com/~red/
H4, Moyes X2, Falcon Tandem, HES Tracer, Quantum |
|
|
|
|