| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
psuguru 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Aug 2010 Posts: 378 Location: The Darkest Hinterlands of Essex
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 5:33 am Post subject: |
#21 |
| jjcote wrote: |
I also say that (as a person who doesn't know a damn thing about towing), I don't understand the bit about not being high enough to land on your feet. I'm not saying that it wasn't the case, just that I don't understand how this works. It seems like if you were starting off on your feet, you already had enough altitude to flare, but maybe you actually dropped lower before the tow was aborted?
|
A couple of things about this accident have got lost in the noise:
1. There was very little wind.
2. The ground was soft and soggy.
This gives the pilot the task of running, on the flat, on soft soil, to flat-out sprinting speed in order to get airborne. If the tow is weak, the pilot's not going to have enough urge to accelerate in the period between falling over from trying to run very fast and hitting the ground. The tow will be pulling the pilot forwards though and this effectively prevents the pilot coming upright. With a few feet of climb, you might have enough wherewithal to bang the master release allowing you to come upright, but this sounds like a dive into the turf.
I think the instructor should have anticipated this problem and I believe the instructor also should not have allowed the pilot to attempt a flight with unsuitable equipment. After all, the reason why we take tuition is that we don't know as much as the instructor and are substituting their skill and experience for our own lack of knowledge .
I've got a pair of 6" comedy exploding wheels and a pair of 9" pneumatics. So far, the pneumatics have never come off the basebar. _________________ "We should all have our heads examined"
"That's Rule Number 4"
CP Hill, CP Tow. Moyes Malibu 188. |
|
|
|
dave hopkins 3 thumbs up


Joined: 25 Dec 2010 Posts: 719
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:26 am Post subject: |
#22 |
| psuguru wrote: |
| jjcote wrote: |
I also say that (as a person who doesn't know a damn thing about towing), I don't understand the bit about not being high enough to land on your feet. I'm not saying that it wasn't the case, just that I don't understand how this works. It seems like if you were starting off on your feet, you already had enough altitude to flare, but maybe you actually dropped lower before the tow was aborted?
|
A couple of things about this accident have got lost in the noise:
1. There was very little wind.
2. The ground was soft and soggy.
This gives the pilot the task of running, on the flat, on soft soil, to flat-out sprinting speed in order to get airborne. If the tow is weak, the pilot's not going to have enough urge to accelerate in the period between falling over from trying to run very fast and hitting the ground. The tow will be pulling the pilot forwards though and this effectively prevents the pilot coming upright. With a few feet of climb, you might have enough wherewithal to bang the master release allowing you to come upright, but this sounds like a dive into the turf.
I think the instructor should have anticipated this problem and I believe the instructor also should not have allowed the pilot to attempt a flight with unsuitable equipment. After all, the reason why we take tuition is that we don't know as much as the instructor and are substituting their skill and experience for our own lack of knowledge .
I've got a pair of 6" comedy exploding wheels and a pair of 9" pneumatics. So far, the pneumatics have never come off the basebar. |
Hang gliding is a rough and tumble game. There is no sure way not to get hurt. WE are 100% responsible for oue selves! We should know how to fall. Throwing all our weight on to our arms is dangerous and we need to know how to let go and fold . We also need to know when to climb into the control bar and make the glider take the blow!
I watched a friend bite the ground hard yesterday. Small thin wheels just sunk and grapped and he swung through hard. No damage or injury ,but it was scary looking. Big wheels would have made it easy.
I have done the same with my VR and when that beast come down on your head it can hurt you but Ive been lucky or tough or both.
dave |
|
|
|
psuguru 3 thumbs up


Joined: 02 Aug 2010 Posts: 378 Location: The Darkest Hinterlands of Essex
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:08 am Post subject: No argument |
#23 |
I agree with all you have said.
However, life isn't perfect and people have different levels of skill and ability.
The thing about this accident was that he was being towed, and towed into the ground at about 18mph (think "high speed bicycle accident"). The pilot was pulling the glider via the hang strap and wouldn't have swung, because he'd already be forward in the frame. The only thing that might have saved his arms, given that the wheels had stuck, would have been letting go, but who knows what would have happened then. He probably had about 1-2 seconds of "Oh ,s***" time to sort himself out.
I've only recently completed a tow course and the instructor was very particular about the wheels in use. He made one student exchange his wheels for a school set and thought that my 9" pneumatics were only just adequate, given the field we were in.
But I didn't turn up for the course without wheels................ _________________ "We should all have our heads examined"
"That's Rule Number 4"
CP Hill, CP Tow. Moyes Malibu 188.
Last edited by psuguru on Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
dave hopkins 3 thumbs up


Joined: 25 Dec 2010 Posts: 719
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:23 am Post subject: Re: No argument |
#24 |
[quote="psuguru"]I agree with all you have said.
However, life isn't perfect and people have different levels of skill and ability.
The thing about this accident was that he was being towed, and towed into the ground at about 18mph (think "high speed bicycle accident"). The pilot was pulling the glider via the hang strap and wouldn't have swung, because he'd already be forward in the frame. The only thing that might have saved his arms, given that the wheels had stuck, would have been letting go, but who knows what woud have happened then. He probably had about 1-2 seconds of "Oh ,s***" time to sort himself out.
I've only recently completed a tow course and the instructor was very particular about the wheels in use. He made one student exchange his wheels for a school set and thought that my 9" pneumatics were only just adequate, given the field we were in.
But I didn't turn up for the course without wheels................[/quote
I agree . Being on tow and hitting the ground is a very bad situation. It will hurt you . Did it once . Foot launching a toppless . Wrong AOA and that hurt! Stiff neck for a week.
Dave |
|
|
|
dievhart 2 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 1430 Location: Santa Cruz, CA (Fort Funston)
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:17 am Post subject: |
#25 |
Instructor should have known better....just bad.
Diev _________________ Diev Hart
T2C 154, Lightspeed 4, Super Sport 153,
SL200, U2 160, Predator 142
FL, CL, FSL, AWCL, RLF, AT, TFL, TUR, XC, MNTR
http://www.dievhart.com/hangglide.html
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hgphotos/
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=25414 (HG.org Camera Mounts) |
|
|
|
blindrodie 3 thumbs up

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Posts: 3752 Location: Roeland Park, KS
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 12:04 pm Post subject: |
#26 |
HAHA just noticed the new AVATAR!!!
Sweet...
 _________________ "Tow me up. I'll find my way down"
Kansas City Hang Glider Supplies
Guggenmos E7
WW U2 145
WW F1 195
FlyTec 6015
CG 1000
Tracer Plus
Organ Donor
Torrey Hawk #212 |
|
|
|
lostgriz 3 thumbs up


Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 1928 Location: Virginia
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 6:27 pm Post subject: |
#27 |
There have been lots of great and educated opinions voiced here and I will share another for you to consider (not that mine is especially great or educated).
1. I believe that there are people out there that shouldn't be flying. The training process sorts out some these folks, but some slip through the cracks. If you have already broken an arm in a similar accident, maybe you are one of those people. This has nothing to do with how smart you are IMHO. I know of at least one pilot that has their ratings, but should not be in the aire in my opinion and they have been flying for a long time.
2. With all due respect, I have watched many people learning to fly and many times their evaluation of an incident does not reflect the actual circumstances. I am not saying that this is the case here, but I think it is unfair to place too much judgement on the instructor based on this account.
3. Pushing out is a fundamental NO, NO that sounds to be the cause of this accident and based on your write-up, sounds like it may be the reason you broke your arm the last time. If you are flying that low and never gained altitude as you said, you should have had your landing gear below you still. It is common practice from my experience that if a student is pushing out to gain altitude, the instructor will power down and bring them back to the ground, so that they don't gain altitude that could result in a more serious incident. I have seen tow students upset about an incident like this (although not as serious) and grumbling that it was the instructors fault because they should have pulled them higher..... You can certainely see where this logic is flawed, but from the perspective of the student they thought they were doing everything right and just needed more power under tow.
4. The wheels were not the cause of this accident. I have seen people whack with the inflated wheels and the big plastic wheels too. The analogy previously given with the parachute was a good one. IMHO I have seen the two piece wheels work fine before. I recently saw someone roll/slide in on those tiny little WW wheels on a U2 on rough ground and was amazed that they worked. If someone on here has used and had an issue with the two piece wheels, then you are just as guilty of making a mistake to trust these as the instructor and this pilot, so why should the instructor be nailed to the cross over this incident, BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND PERSPECTIVE THAT WE HAVE.
5. I have also been at the site of various types of incidents from broken bones to fatalities (none hang gliding) and I have been amazed at how people have responded, everything from losing it completely to laughter. You hired your instructor to assist you with learning to hang glide, not to be your perfect EMT. Please don't take that as too cold. I have had other people comment on the fact that my wife and I don't cottle our kids. If the bone isn't showing we tell them to dust off and wipe their tears..... I am just saying that everybody handles these type of things differently. He took you to the hospital, that's all you should expect.
Finally, I am very sorry for your injury and wish you the best in your recovery. I have walked away from flight once (PGs), not due to an injury, but because I felt I needed to for my family. I know that is a tough decision an it hurts. I am not the one to say if you should or shouldn't be flying, and neither is anyone on the Org, based on the information that we have. There are lots of different ways to enjoy flight, it just may not be that hang gliders is not the right fit for you and your circumstances.
Heal well my friend. _________________ Wills Wing U2 160
"Better to have a shorter life that is full of what you enjoy doing, than a long life spent in a miserable way." - Alan Watts
http://vimeo.com/27531088# |
|
|
|
dievhart 2 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 1430 Location: Santa Cruz, CA (Fort Funston)
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:41 am Post subject: |
#28 |
| lostgriz wrote: |
| .... so why should the instructor be nailed to the cross over this incident, BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND PERSPECTIVE THAT WE HAVE.... |
Because he gave the student wheels that he should know (as an instructor) will not work in that situation.....(instead of telling the student they had to wait/get the correct equipment)....and then proceeded to pulled the student (into the ground).
I still don't get why they are winch towing new students, who can barley launch or land......oh wait, you guys paid how much per tow?????????
Do you even have the option to just stay on the hills?
I still have not ST and still don't have a desire to...(unless there is no other way to get up there)...but, help me understand something...
I you start off good and get flying but are not going up and push out a little the operator will kill the tow? So one must just keep skimming the ground until the operator pulls harder? YUCK, I hate skimming on tow (did it the one time I have tried a form of ST (at Tollhouse with Paul S.))
Diev _________________ Diev Hart
T2C 154, Lightspeed 4, Super Sport 153,
SL200, U2 160, Predator 142
FL, CL, FSL, AWCL, RLF, AT, TFL, TUR, XC, MNTR
http://www.dievhart.com/hangglide.html
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hgphotos/
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=25414 (HG.org Camera Mounts) |
|
|
|
jjcote 3 thumbs up


Joined: 01 Dec 2007 Posts: 3216 Location: Lunenburg, MA, USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:22 am Post subject: |
#29 |
| dievhart wrote: |
| Do you even have the option to just stay on the hills? |
I don't think the original poster is around any more, and he didn't say where he was from, but it very well be a place that doesn't have any hills. _________________ H4 + various skills (only foot-launch so far)
WW UltraSport 147, WW Falcon2 170, PacAir Vision Mark IV 17
My HG wiki profile and my flying blog |
|
|
|
lostgriz 3 thumbs up


Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 1928 Location: Virginia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 6:58 pm Post subject: |
#30 |
| dievhart wrote: |
| lostgriz wrote: |
| .... so why should the instructor be nailed to the cross over this incident, BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND PERSPECTIVE THAT WE HAVE.... |
Because he gave the student wheels that he should know (as an instructor) will not work in that situation.....(instead of telling the student they had to wait/get the correct equipment)....and then proceeded to pulled the student (into the ground).
I still don't get why they are winch towing new students, who can barley launch or land......oh wait, you guys paid how much per tow?????????
Do you even have the option to just stay on the hills?
I still have not ST and still don't have a desire to...(unless there is no other way to get up there)...but, help me understand something...
I you start off good and get flying but are not going up and push out a little the operator will kill the tow? So one must just keep skimming the ground until the operator pulls harder? YUCK, I hate skimming on tow (did it the one time I have tried a form of ST (at Tollhouse with Paul S.))
Diev |
One of my points was that we really only have one very skewed perspective on what happened here and for me I wouldn't feel comfortable pouncing on the instructor based on a one sided story.
Based on the story, it sounded like he was scooter towing. People who don't know how to launch and land are towed and trained this way all the time. I have never seen a training operation that charges student's by the tow, so I don't see how that is even relevant.
As far as your question regarding pushing out: if a student is pushing out and flying too slow to safely control the glider, does it make any sense to tow them higher?.........where the consequences of flying too slow and possibly stalling the glider would be likely much more serious than if they are 2 feet off the ground. Remember that this is a student. Of course the ultimate goal isn't to skim along the ground on tow. The idea is that as you demonstrate competence, the instructor will pull you higher, until ultimately you can release from tow with some altitude. If he was that close to the ground, he should have had his feet under him and not been prone and pushing out to try and gain altitude.
Many operations with scooter tows don't have hills and if they are trained properly and the student follows the instruction given, you don't need a hill to become a competent pilot. Sure there will be a little transition to launching in the mountains, but as discussed before on the Org, it is a pretty simple transition. _________________ Wills Wing U2 160
"Better to have a shorter life that is full of what you enjoy doing, than a long life spent in a miserable way." - Alan Watts
http://vimeo.com/27531088# |
|
|
|
Alex 1 thumbs up


Joined: 21 Jul 2006 Posts: 261
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 9:53 am Post subject: |
#31 |
| gasdive wrote: |
Hmmm...
I was taught to land on my feet from the very first day. Wheels might save your bacon, (or they might not as in this case) but if you end up on the wheels, that's a crash.
I strongly disagree with the current style of teaching people that landing on wheels is a perfectly acceptable way of landing a hang glider.
= |
OMG, landing on wheels is not, and never has been, an accident unless some sort of damage and/or injury occurs.
There is no intrinsic value to a foot landing nor to a wheel landing, both achieve the same result if done correctly.
Options are a very good thing and telling pilots not to do something because of aesthetics is highly questionable practice at best. |
|
|
|
bisleybob 3 thumbs up


Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 780 Location: east coast, England, UK
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:33 pm Post subject: |
#32 |
i think any descision you make as a student should be checked and confirmed by the instructor period. thats what you pay them for, what if you had turned up with the wrong wheels you would expect him to say hold on they are not suitable.
if the wheels where not suitable then he should have sent you home, to allow you to continue with impropper stuff is negligent,
the descision to go ahead with training was the instructors, often asumptions are made with returning pilots that they can skip steps or progress quicker as its not their first time and so now we have our margin for error. "he should be ok on that" is often herd. should?? how about he stays on the training kit until he proves he doesnt need it.
i dont know the schools there but here everything is provided, checked and suitable. they check all your descisions with the only thing they cant control being your actions in the air, but even then can respond to them with advice by radio.
when you are qualified you are responsible for your self, when you are training they are responsible for you at leased as far as the right equipment is concearned.
it is sad that you are the third pilot i know who has quit due to a injoury in training. _________________ fly2 tandem (aerowtow training)
falcon 2 and 3 195
aeros Target 16
wills wing eagle 180
Airwave Sportster (L)158
Other favourites flown but not owened
Airwave Xtreme (topless), aeros discuss |
|
|
|
|