| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
gasdive 2 thumbs up


Joined: 12 Aug 2009 Posts: 1161 Location: port macquarie australia
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:06 pm Post subject: |
#101 |
Maybe I'm not being clear...
The ways to prevent whacks or fix whackers so far proposed are:
Take an oath to improve,
(I haven't done that)
Day or two on the training hill,
(No, never do that)
All fly low performance single surface gliders
(My GTR was as hot a ship as you could buy at the time)
Intentionally land cross/downwind to practice in case you need to land cross/downwind,
(I've never *intentionally* landeded cross/down just for practice)
Install a stall warning horn,
(I don't have one)
Practice,
(Yet I was able to flare the glider to a no-step landing on my first attempt, zero practice)
Fit flaps,
(none of my gliders have had flaps)
There has been a major improvement in instruction that hasn't yet made it into the mainstream,
(I learnt 30 years ago)
Maintain currency,
(I landed pretty well after 20 years of not flying at all, yet I'd forgotten how to put the glider together, can't get much less current than that.)
Flare correctly,
(I'm not sure about that, I got some style correction when I came back to the sport that changed the way I held the uprights, so I was either doing it wrong before, or doing it wrong after, but either way, I never whacked)
Teach people how to land correctly in the first place,
(hey!!!!!!!!! THAT'S ME!!!!!!!!!!! I think my instructor taught me correctly in the first place, but I think most people think their instructor does that.)
My personal favourite: Fly with a helmet that keeps your ears uncovered,
(Robert flys with a full face helment)
So there are people who show that all the possible reasons so far proposed for the whackorama that we see around us aren't the real reason.
So what *is* the real reason? Maybe the "taught correctly in the first place"? If so what does "correctly" mean and how should it be taught?
=:) _________________ Jason Rogers,
http://zerods.blogspot.com/
http://slow-cook.blogspot.com
http://thingsineverunderstood.blogspot.com/
Lock a diver in an empty room for an hour with three ball bearings. On your return, one will be lost, one will be broken and one will be stolen. |
|
|
|
FlyingTechGuy 3 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Nov 2009 Posts: 116
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:54 pm Post subject: |
#102 |
This all seems to be getting away from the original question - which is, why don't Paraglider pilots convert in larger numbers, if at all?
The same things that applied at the beginning of this discussion as it relates to PG vs. HG - still do. From many Paragliding pilot's perspective:
- Hang Gliders are a pain in the ass to carry
- Hang Gliders are a pain in the ass to transport and might even involve a different vehicle
- Hang Gliders take a long time to set up and pack away compared to bags
- Hang Gliders at the top of the performance category are more expensive than their Paragliding counterpart
- Hang Gliders cannot be hiked up to many launch sites that Paragliding pilots hike to, including ones that go through the woods.
Among all of these things, who whacks and who does not whack is irrelevant because that changes none of the above. Nor does that change the fact that MOST landings at a given shared site are in fact whack-less.
A Paraglider pilot only needs to watch many landings to see that landing well and consistently IS within the grasp of many HG pilots, whether they are flying SS or a T2C. And if it's possible for them to land well, then it is also possible for a would-be converted Paragliding pilot to land well.
And having flown both, I can tell you that many Paragliding pilots do in fact - get this. Because on the Paragliding side, most of the drama occurs on launch and not on landing. I've seen so many people get jacked up on launch in a Paraglider that it's not funny. But Paraglider pilots don't look at that and say "hey, Paragliders are unsafe because I saw several people get jacked up on takeoff." They understand there is judgment, conditions, and pilot skill level at work there.
There is no reason to believe that they do not equally realize this if they see a whack.
I believe as I stated earlier that most Paragliding pilots are in fact not serious about getting into Hang Gliding because of the factors expressed in the list above. And really a PG pilot that expresses hesitation solely because they saw a few ppl whack is a lame excuse. I prefer to fly HG because the hassle is worth it to me, and because I actually believe they are safer than Paragliders in several ways.
Lastly I'd say it's important to keep things in perspective. We've all seen some very bad landings in Commercial Airplanes. You know, the kind where the airplane cartwheels down the runway and kills most people. We don't see a lot of Hang Gliders cartwheeling and flinging the pilot about. Whacks are to be avoided, agreed, but they are not all that spectacular to be judged off-putting to any open-minded would-be HG pilot.
Just my 2.5 cents  _________________ <Avatar = catching some air in 1973
-----------------------------------------------------
Fixed Wing - PPL
Helicopter - Commercial Rating
Licensed Skydiver
Hang Glider (1972) / Paraglider (2009) |
|
|
|
AirNut 3 thumbs up


Joined: 01 Nov 2011 Posts: 148 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:45 pm Post subject: |
#103 |
| gasdive wrote: |
I'm somewhat confused by the whole landing problems issue
I haven't *ever* whacked.
I've never bent a downtube on landing (I broke two crashing into a hill when I had about 1 minute of logged airtime and nothing since)
I've never had to "run out" a landing. I've done some running landings to see what they were like after reading the discussions here.
I flew for years and years without wheels and never missed them. I only put them on for flying power harness and most of the time don't bother to put them on.
I never bother to go back to the training hill (other than when I restarted gliding). My first landing after no flying at all for 20 years was on my feet and I kicked myself because I didn't "stick" the landing and took one step forward.
I fly the coast and I fly inland, same same.
I simply don't understand why anyone finds it difficult. What on earth are you finding hard about it?
= |
Can't agree more! I'm a returning pilot who flew from '76 through to '90 and am just now getting back into it. Like gasdive, in all the time I was flying (apart from the first couple of months), I never 'wacked' or dropped the glider. And most of my flying was inland (probably 5% in coastal conditions).
I also can't understand the difficulty. Somewhere between '90 (when I quit) and now, the sport seems to have gone off the rails somehow (training? peer pressure to advance to the new blade wings too early?). Even the term 'wack' seems to say something about the current attitude of the sport to the 'landing problem'. Back in the old days, we (at least in Australia), called it a 'nose-in'. Whereas the term 'wack' seems to inject a folksy, semi-humorous, colloquial tone to what is really...a CRASH!
My theory is that self-denial has a lot to do with it. If you can admit to yourself that one out of every five of your landings ends in a CRASH, any rational person would be taking themselves back to the training hill. But when it's a 'wack' and is considered to be, well, sort of 'normal' (everyone's doing it), it then becomes easy to just say to yourself, "well I'll try to do better next time" and just move on to the next flight.
The other factor which I think might explain the increased 'wacking' that seems to be such a feature of modern hang gliding is the good old peer-pressure thing that pushes less-experienced pilots to leave their easy-to-land SS gliders and move up to the latest, super-cool, XC-busting DS gliders. Now I think that is just human nature and was certainly operating back in the old days. But back then, maybe the difference between the low-end gliders and the high-end gliders was less than it is now (not having flown a modern blade wing, I'm just guessing about that). _________________ If God had wanted us to stay on the ground, he'd have given us roots.
SL195, Ranger2, Mega2, Stingray, Meteor 150, GT MIssile, Mars 170, Malibu 166 |
|
|
|
AirNut 3 thumbs up


Joined: 01 Nov 2011 Posts: 148 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:48 pm Post subject: |
#104 |
| FormerFF wrote: |
| therider wrote: |
I have been trying to show my friends how much worthy of efforts this sport is, but as Nicos and other pointed out, the society is incredibly lazy. No one wants to break a sweat, even for a large return afterwards. I did manage to bring a coworker to his first lesson, but the fact that he flew with his father on a small airplane when was young, helped a great deal to push him over the barrier.
|
I wouldn't agree with the contention that Americans are particularly lazy. I see that the number of marathons run in this country is now over 500,000 per year. There are lots of other demanding sports that have plenty of participation. The hard cold reality is that we're the outliers. Most people don't want to hang glide, or paraglide for that matter. Humans have an innate fear of falling, it's a desirable survival instinct, and hanging underneath a glider scares the crap out of most people.
Honestly, I don't know how things are going for everyone else, but there are many days that I return home from my job so wrung out that nothing seems appealing. Add a home and a family and it's amazing that many of us do anything in what little time and energy that is left.
As far as the convenience aspect of HG vs PG, if convenience is important, neither of these sports are for you. You might want to try tennis or golf or running or bicycling. |
Good point (certainly true in my case)! I think that might help explain the demographics in hang gliding: lots of old or returning pilots, but not that many in their 30's (the very age when many are growing their families, their businesses, or both). _________________ If God had wanted us to stay on the ground, he'd have given us roots.
SL195, Ranger2, Mega2, Stingray, Meteor 150, GT MIssile, Mars 170, Malibu 166 |
|
|
|
|