New wing advice for a heavier pilot - Hang Gliding Org - Worlds largest Hang Gliding community, discover Hang Gliding

Search

  • Sorry...You must register to activate searching









Post new topic   Reply to topic    Hang Gliding Org Forum Index -> Hang gliding general->New wing advice for a heavier pilot
BURY this topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Mellowmoods
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 04 Apr 2011
Posts: 61
Location: Santa Barbara area

PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2011 9:42 pm    Post subject: New wing advice for a heavier pilot Reply with quote #1   
I'm considering upgrading from my Ultrasport 166 that I've been flying for 6 years. I'm a H4 pilot but am 6'5" 245 lbs (I'm not fat, as I'm very active in sports and a big guy) which puts me at the TOP, or over, the hook in weights for all hang gliders with the exception of rigid wings.

I've had friends tell me to get a Lightsport 5, move into a Lightspeed 5 or other topless wings. I have never flown a topless, but I've been told the rigidity of them should support my weight better. I just want to up the performance level and enjoy my flying in the local mountains and up the XC potential as well!

Any heavier pilots out there have any advice? What are you flying?
Send private message  Rate this post
Willmrx
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 12 Jan 2008
Posts: 1602
Location: Northern Cal

PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2011 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #2   
U2 160, or the large Lightsport are good choices. Plus it (seems) that the new crop of gliders do not degrade in performance with high wing loading like in the past. I am amazed with the way the T2C 144 performs with high wing loading.

Will

_________________
Let me be a free man, free to travel, free to stop, free to work, free to trade where I choose, free to choose my own teachers, free to follow the religion of my fathers, free to talk, think and act for myself -- and I will obey every law or submit to the penalty.---- Chief Joseph, Washington, D.C. 1879
Send private message  Rate this post
CHassan
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 4594
Location: Ohio

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2011 2:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #3   
Ditto
_________________
Airborne Climax 14 (C1)
WW U2
H3
AT, FL,ST, RLF, TUR.

There is an art, it says, or rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. … Clearly, it is this second part, the missing, which presents the difficulties. ~~~Douglas Adams
Send private message Blog  Rate this post
Wes
2 thumbs up
2 thumbs up


Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Posts: 257
Location: Salt Lake City

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2011 4:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #4   
The U2 160 carried my weight just fine at 230 lbs. The large T2 also flew well for me. At 200 lbs it does fly better.
Send private message  Rating: 3 thumbs up
$!><
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 1037
Location: Connecticut

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2011 4:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #5   
Quote:
I'm not fat


Link


Another big boned pilot. I thought I was the only one. Smile

_________________
$!><
____________
Live while you are alive.
http://www.vimeo.com/six6
Send private message Blog  Rating: 3 thumbs up
Captian Matt
2 thumbs up
2 thumbs up


Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 217
Location: Scituate MA

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2011 4:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #6   
Sport 2 175, I was too light on it with a body weight of 225. Even at the top of the range for the 155 I go up when I do the right thing. More than a few days I soared when most sledded even with the high wing loading. T2, 154 has 285lb max clip in?
_________________
H3, WW SPORT2
Send private message  Rate this post
CHassan
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 4594
Location: Ohio

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2011 7:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #7   
Yup these new wings LOVE to be loaded up. Or at least I think they do. Being somewhat fat, and not highly muscled, my 220lbs gets carried aloft by the Sport 2 155 and my U2 160 with little to no care.

I don't sit on top of the stack. The little guys on the big wings do that. However I can get to the next thermal and rocket up fast enough that I look down on the light guys for a bit.

_________________
Airborne Climax 14 (C1)
WW U2
H3
AT, FL,ST, RLF, TUR.

There is an art, it says, or rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. … Clearly, it is this second part, the missing, which presents the difficulties. ~~~Douglas Adams
Send private message Blog  Rate this post
Eteamjack
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 1125
Location: So Cal

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2011 7:20 am    Post subject: Big Guys Reply with quote #8   
I'm flying a Sport2 175 with a hookin of about 220 and it fly's fine. Sometimes i get pushed out of things, but under normal conditions it's pretty good. In my estimation it fly's like a big falcon only with a little performance. Definitely more performance than an Ultrasport and easier to land. My Discus 160
like's a pilot 200lb's or more as would a U2 160 or litesport5. The 150+
size topless would most definitely carry the weight.

_________________
H4 (1979) Lake Elsinore. Ca. U2 160 (Sweet)
Send private message  Rate this post
Mellowmoods
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 04 Apr 2011
Posts: 61
Location: Santa Barbara area

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2011 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #9   
$!>< wrote:
Quote:
I'm not fat


Link


Another big boned pilot. I thought I was the only one. Smile


Good one.... LOL
Send private message  Rate this post
Roadrunner
2 thumbs up
2 thumbs up


Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Posts: 371
Location: California

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2011 8:31 am    Post subject: Landing, and being Big Reply with quote #10   
I just read your post, you talk about hooking in at a low weight of 230 lbs. Well I was called the Big Guy in the Sky for a reason. I have flown a Predator 158 for years. The Predator 158 has been awesome. Talk about landing. One would have to blow it pretty badly in order to whack it. I went from a 225 Wills Wing Tandem, " My first Glider " right into my 2nd glider, a Predator 158. And I felt, and still feel like a Predator 158 lands better than a Falcon Tandem. I have flown the Predator 158 at a hook in weight of 330 pounds. It took me two years of flying it, to achieve my first whack. It sounds like you a little lite, burt if you put on some size, think about trying out a predator. I guess this is about it. See Ya Chris... AKA "The Big Guy in the Sky"
Send private message  Rating: 3 thumbs up
Mellowmoods
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 04 Apr 2011
Posts: 61
Location: Santa Barbara area

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2011 4:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #11   
Hmmmm..... sounds like I need to find a demo day somewhere and try out a few wings.
Send private message  Rate this post
Flyking
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 21 May 2009
Posts: 603
Location: Ogden UT

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 6:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #12   
Ditto To Roadrunner. The Predator 158 would be the glider for you. Just talked to Joe Spiney and they are designing a faired basetube for the Predator with Sensor downtubes. I have the Sensor downtubes on my 142 and love it. I will order the basetube when they have it made. The Predator is the BEST kingposted glider made for the price. You might also look into a big Sensor. I like the Predator because you dont have to mess with those stupid tip wands. the Predator is made by D*ck Chenney in Layton Utah with over 40 years of sail making experiance (He made a lot of Comets, TRX's, Saturns, and Predators). My sail is 10 years old now and still lookes brand new. It is a big light glider that is easy to land. Test fly one. W/ an O2 bottle, camelback, and all your gear for XC you will weigh in just right. Flew my predator at the South Side last weekend and made an awesome low save. I was unzipped coming into land when I felt a bump,climbed out and landed back on top. thumbsup thumbsup
_________________
H-4. Flying since 1975, Gliders, 17 ft Manta St, Electra Flyer Wildflower 220, Leading Edge Air Foil 6-C 160, Electra Flyer Oly 160, WW Omega 220, UP Comet 160, UP Comet O.V.R.160, UP Comet 2 160, UP TRX 160, WW Fusion 141, Bennett Dream 220 , UP Predator 142 and T-2 154. Love to Fly King Mt. Willard and the Crawford Mt's are the home sites. FL,AWCL,CL,FSL,RLF,TUR.
Send private message Blog  Rate this post
DocSoc
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 14 May 2007
Posts: 1881
Location: Miami Beach

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 8:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #13   
Everyone has said the same thing, all these newer gliders love the wing loading and it's tru I know because I hooking some where around 270-80lbs including harness, water, bag, and my 235lb @$$.

I fly the 170 Freedom and blow many Dbl Surface gliders away n every aspect except going into the wind. I also fly the WW U2 160 and that is a rocket ship.

It's nice to know you can rocket in but also not have to force the speed due to wing loading as well. Landings are ever the event-less situation.

I have flown the T2C and have one coming that is going to be amazing. That glider the 154 is just a machine of unmatched performance.

So my friend, the issue is not what glider to buy, but how much do you want to spend???

4000, 5000, 9000 or something used that has the validation by so many HGers and that will get the job done with maximum fun? All this needs to be evaluated.

Safe Flying!

-DocSoc

_________________
Socrates
Rogallo Member USHPA
"Team Chicken Hawk"
Send private message Blog  Rate this post
CAL
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 3464
Location: OGDEN, UT

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 8:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #14   
the price tags for the different gliders are such New

Wills Wing U2 160 4975.00

Predator 158 5900.00

litesport 6840.00


Wow i didn't know there was such a price difference

you could get the state of the art T2 for 6375.00

i myself love the U2, it handles so sweet, lands well, i am so much more relaxed on that glider i will probably not step up to a T2 but before i would spend what they want for the other gliders, i would get the T2, hands down the T2 will perform better.

for those prices the U2 is the glider to get, i am quite sure it would keep up with the other higher priced gliders, might even out perform them

_________________
Explore nature from the eyes of an Eagle
Send private message  Rate this post
Flyking
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 21 May 2009
Posts: 603
Location: Ogden UT

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 11:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #15   
One more I forgot about. The Aeros Combat L 14.9. Kind of looks like a topless Predator W/O vortex generators but it does have a tail. What do you think Norman Laughing
_________________
H-4. Flying since 1975, Gliders, 17 ft Manta St, Electra Flyer Wildflower 220, Leading Edge Air Foil 6-C 160, Electra Flyer Oly 160, WW Omega 220, UP Comet 160, UP Comet O.V.R.160, UP Comet 2 160, UP TRX 160, WW Fusion 141, Bennett Dream 220 , UP Predator 142 and T-2 154. Love to Fly King Mt. Willard and the Crawford Mt's are the home sites. FL,AWCL,CL,FSL,RLF,TUR.
Send private message Blog  Rate this post
andylongvq
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 May 2011
Posts: 477
Location: California

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 11:58 am    Post subject: Handling Your Weight Reply with quote #16   
Andy here...

We talked over on the Oz Report. What it comes down to is you'll only know what will work when you go and fly the various gliders. So I'd get into Demo mode and fly them.

On the topless gliders, try to fly them when you'll know there will be some wind to land in, so you don't have to worry about sticking the landing.

And of course, there's always an Exxtacy or an Atos VX.

Let us know how it turns out!
Send private message  Rate this post
Mellowmoods
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 04 Apr 2011
Posts: 61
Location: Santa Barbara area

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #17   
Thanks for the advice everyone... I'm just going to have to keep my eye open for some demo days in So Cal. I definately want to try a rigid sometime as well. Sounds like I can't go wrong with just about any of the large higher performance wings even though I am at the top of the weight range.

Because most of the sites around me are RLF, I may want to head to a spot where that isn't such an issue when trying out topless and rigid wings (don't know where I can demo rigids). I might have to take a trip to a flight park where towing is done to get a good feel for a different variety of gliders.

Outside of going to Florida, or Texas, are there places closer to California where there may be a plethora of wings to sample?
Send private message  Rate this post
andylongvq
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 May 2011
Posts: 477
Location: California

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 8:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #18   
Mellowmoods wrote:

Outside of going to Florida, or Texas, are there places closer to California where there may be a plethora of wings to sample?


Here's a suggestion. With the summer pattern coming up, Fort Funston has stretches where it's soarable almost every day for weeks on end.

Those are great conditions for trying out gliders because the conditions are easy and you have 10-15 mph smooth winds to top land in.

You could hook up with Pat Denevan at Mission Soaring and do a bunch of demos with him. He's got Wills, Moyes, etc.

- Andy
Send private message  Rate this post
Mellowmoods
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 04 Apr 2011
Posts: 61
Location: Santa Barbara area

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote #19   
Nice Andy... Thats a great idea. I've always wanted to fly Funston anyway. :-)
Send private message  Rate this post
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Hang Gliding Org Forum Index -> Hang gliding general
 
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1


 
Jump to:  


(c) HangGliding.org All rights reserved. Based on PhpBB